Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33965677›Full record

ArticleTuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland)2021

Evaluation of the molecular bacterial load assay for detecting viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in cerebrospinal fluid before and during tuberculous meningitis treatment.

Hoang Thanh Hai, Wilber Sabiiti, Do Dang Anh Thu, Nguyen Hoan Phu, Stephen H Gillespie, Guy E Thwaites, Nguyen Thuy Thuong Thuong

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hoang Thanh HaiOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Wilber SabiitiSchool of Medicine, Division of Infection and Global Health, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Do Dang Anh ThuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Nguyen Hoan PhuOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam.
Stephen H GillespieSchool of Medicine, Division of Infection and Global Health, University of St Andrews, United Kingdom.
Guy E ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nguyen Thuy Thuong ThuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam; Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: thuongntt@oucru.org.
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of St Andrews · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New tools to monitor treatment response and predict outcome from tuberculous meningitis (TBM) are urgently required. We retrospectively evaluated the 16S rRNA-based molecular bacterial load assay (MBLA) to quantify viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis in serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from adults with TBM. 187 CSF samples were collected before and during the first two months of treatment from 99 adults TBM, comprising 56 definite, 43 probable or possible TBM, and 18 non-TBM and preserved at -80°C prior to MBLA. We compared MBLA against MGIT culture, GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear. Before treatment, MBLA was positive in 34/99 (34.3%), significantly lower than MGIT 47/99 (47.5%), Xpert 51/99 (51.5%) and ZN smear 55/99 (55.5%). After one month of treatment, MBLA and MGIT were positive in 3/38 (7.9%) and 4/38 (10.5%), respectively, whereas Xpert and ZN smear remained positive in 19/38 (50.0%) and 18/38 (47.4%). In summary, MBLA was less likely to detect CSF bacteria before the start of treatment compared with MGIT culture, Xpert and ZN smear. MBLA and MGIT positivity fell during treatment because of detecting only viable bacteria, whereas Xpert and ZN smear remained positive for longer because of detecting both live and dead bacteria. Sample storage and processing may have reduced MBLA-detectable viable bacteria; and sampling earlier in treatment may yield more useful results. Prospective studies with CSF sampling after 1-2 weeks are warranted.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadAdultFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium tuberculosisRetrospective StudiesRNA, Ribosomal, 16STuberculosis, MeningealRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNACerebrospinal fluidMycobacterium tuberculosisTuberculosis meningitisViable bacterial load

Identifiers

PMID33965677
PMCPMC8204225
OpenAlexW3159759925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.