ArticleLancet (London, England)2021
What is the right level of spending needed for health and care in the UK?
Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Access or Engagement: The Potential Role of Financial Incentives in Colorectal Cancer Screening.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026Article
- Geospatial Visualisation of Distance to General Practitioner Facilities with Population Density Patterns in the United Kingdom.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CICing the partnership model into the future: a new social enterprise model for general practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
- Hidden costs of surgical complications: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies · 2025Article
- Primary care stability as a social determinant.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- A comprehensive value-based method for new nuclear medical service pricing: with case study of radium [223BMC health services research · 2024Article
- 'You get looked at like you're failing': A reflexive thematic analysis of experiences of mental health and wellbeing support for NHS staff.Journal of health psychology · 2023Article
- Securing a sustainable and fit-for-purpose UK health and care workforce.Lancet (London, England) · 2021Article
- Economic Evaluations of Speech and Language Therapy Interventions: A Scoping Review.International journal of language & communication disordersArticle
- Top 100 most cited economic evaluation papers of preventive oral health programmes: A bibliometric analysis.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The health and care sector plays a valuable role in improving population health and societal wellbeing, protecting people from the financial consequences of illness, reducing health and income inequalities, and supporting economic growth. However, there is much debate regarding the appropriate level of funding for health and care in the UK. In this Health Policy paper, we look at the economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and historical spending in the UK and comparable countries, assess the role of private spending, and review spending projections to estimate future needs. Public spending on health has increased by 3·7% a year on average since the National Health Service (NHS) was founded in 1948 and, since then, has continued to assume a larger share of both the economy and government expenditure. In the decade before the ongoing pandemic started, the rate of growth of government spending for the health and care sector slowed. We argue that without average growth in public spending on health of at least 4% per year in real terms, there is a real risk of degradation of the NHS, reductions in coverage of benefits, increased inequalities, and increased reliance on private financing. A similar, if not higher, level of growth in public spending on social care is needed to provide high standards of care and decent terms and conditions for social care staff, alongside an immediate uplift in public spending to implement long-overdue reforms recommended by the Dilnot Commission to improve financial protection. COVID-19 has highlighted major issues in the capacity and resilience of the health and care system. We recommend an independent review to examine the precise amount of additional funds that are required to better equip the UK to withstand further acute shocks and major threats to health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.