Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33965066›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2021

Securing a sustainable and fit-for-purpose UK health and care workforce.

Michael Anderson, Ciaran O'Neill, Jill Macleod Clark, Andrew Street, Michael Woods, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Anita Charlesworth, Moira Whyte, Margaret Foster, Azeem Majeed and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. When doctors falter: Resilience in modern obstetrics and gynecology, a narrative review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  4. Consultation complexity and professionals consulted: a retrospective cohort study in English primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  5. Mental health and kidney disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Management and Patient Flow for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy in UK Primary Care.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Developing a Set of Key Principles for Care Planning Within Older Adult Care Homes: A Modified Delphi Survey.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michael AndersonDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Electronic address: m.anderson5@lse.ac.uk.
Ciaran O'NeillSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queens University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Jill Macleod ClarkFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Andrew StreetDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Michael WoodsDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Charlotte Johnston-WebberDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Anita CharlesworthThe Health Foundation, London, UK; College of Social Sciences, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Moira WhyteCollege of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Margaret FosterNHS Wales Shared Services Partnership, Cardiff, UK.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Emma PitchforthDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Elias MossialosDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Miqdad AsariaDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Alistair McGuireDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 13% of the total UK workforce is employed in the health and care sector. Despite substantial workforce planning efforts, the effectiveness of this planning has been criticised. Education, training, and workforce plans have typically considered each health-care profession in isolation and have not adequately responded to changing health and care needs. The results are persistent vacancies, poor morale, and low retention. Areas of particular concern highlighted in this Health Policy paper include primary care, mental health, nursing, clinical and non-clinical support, and social care. Responses to workforce shortfalls have included a high reliance on foreign and temporary staff, small-scale changes in skill mix, and enhanced recruitment drives. Impending challenges for the UK health and care workforce include growing multimorbidity, an increasing shortfall in the supply of unpaid carers, and the relative decline of the attractiveness of the National Health Service (NHS) as an employer internationally. We argue that to secure a sustainable and fit-for-purpose health and care workforce, integrated workforce approaches need to be developed alongside reforms to education and training that reflect changes in roles and skill mix, as well as the trend towards multidisciplinary working. Enhancing career development opportunities, promoting staff wellbeing, and tackling discrimination in the NHS are all needed to improve recruitment, retention, and morale of staff. An urgent priority is to offer sufficient aftercare and support to staff who have been exposed to high-risk situations and traumatic experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to growing calls to recognise and reward health and care staff, growth in pay must at least keep pace with projected rises in average earnings, which in turn will require linking future NHS funding allocations to rises in pay. Through illustrative projections, we show that, to sustain annual growth in the workforce at approximately 2·4%, increases in NHS expenditure of 4% annually in real terms will be required. Above all, a radical long-term strategic vision is needed to ensure that the future NHS workforce is fit for purpose.

Indexed as

Health PolicyCOVID-19Health OccupationsHealth WorkforceHumansOccupational StressPersonnel SelectionState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33965066
PMCPMC9634455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.