Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33965065›Full record

ArticleLancet (London, England)2021

The changing health needs of the UK population.

Martin McKee, Karen Dunnell, Michael Anderson, Carol Brayne, Anita Charlesworth, Charlotte Johnston-Webber, Martin Knapp, Alistair McGuire, John N Newton, David Taylor and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lancet (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Future perspectives in prehospital emergency medicine.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Aging, longevity, and healthy aging: the public health approach.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Martin McKeeDepartment of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Karen DunnellLondon, UK.
Michael AndersonDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. Electronic address: m.anderson5@lse.ac.uk.
Carol BrayneCambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anita CharlesworthThe Health Foundation, London, UK; College of Social Sciences, Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Charlotte Johnston-WebberDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Martin KnappDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Alistair McGuireDepartment of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
John N NewtonPublic Health England, London, UK.
David TaylorUCL School of Pharmacy, University College London, London, UK.
Richard G WattDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK.
London School of Economics and Political Science · GBUniversity College London · GBHealth Foundation · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBPublic Health England · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demographics of the UK population are changing and so is the need for health care. In this Health Policy, we explore the current health of the population, the changing health needs, and future threats to health. Relative to other high-income countries, the UK is lagging on many health outcomes, such as life expectancy and infant mortality, and there is a growing burden of mental illness. Successes exist, such as the striking improvements in oral health, but inequalities in health persist as well. The growth of the ageing population relative to the working-age population, the rise of multimorbidity, and persistent health inequalities, particularly for preventable illness, are all issues that the National Health Service (NHS) will face in the years to come. Meeting the challenges of the future will require an increased focus on health promotion and disease prevention, involving a more concerted effort to understand and tackle the multiple social, environmental, and economic factors that lie at the heart of health inequalities. The immediate priority of the NHS will be to mitigate the wider and long-term health consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but it must also strengthen its resilience to reduce the impact of other threats to health, such as the UK leaving the EU, climate change, and antimicrobial resistance.

Indexed as

AgingCost of IllnessCOVID-19Delivery of Health CareDemographyHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLife ExpectancyMaternal-Child Health ServicesMental HealthMultimorbidityOral HealthState MedicineUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID33965065
PMCPMC9751760
OpenAlexW3158908877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.