Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33964878›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2021

The strength of selection is consistent across both domains of the MHC class I peptide-binding groove in birds.

Piotr Minias, Ke He, Peter O Dunn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Piotr MiniasDepartment of Biodiversity Studies and Bioeducation, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Łódź, Banacha 1/3, 90-237, Łódź, Poland. pminias@op.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-7742-6750
Ke HeCollege of Animal Science and Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University, Hangzhou, China.
Peter O DunnBehavioral and Molecular Ecology Group, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, USA.
University of Łódź · PLUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USZhejiang A & F University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) codes for the key vertebrate immune receptors responsible for pathogen recognition. Foreign antigens are recognized via their compatibility to hyper-variable region of the peptide-binding groove (PBR), which consists of two separate protein domains. Specifically, the PBR of the MHC class I receptors, which recognize intra-cellular pathogens, has two α domains encoded by exon 2 (α

resultsHere, we took advantage of rapidly accumulating genomic resources to test for the differences in selection patterns between both MHC class I domains of the peptide-binding groove in birds. For this purpose, we compiled a dataset of MHC class I exon 2 and 3 sequences for 120 avian species from 46 families. Our phylogenetically-robust approach provided strong evidence for highly consistent levels of selection on the α

conclusionsWe conclude that the strength of selection and the level of polymorphism are highly consistent between both peptide-binding domains (α

Indexed as

BirdsPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsHumansMajor Histocompatibility ComplexPeptidesPhylogenyPeptidesBirdsGenomicsMajor Histocompatibility ComplexMHCPeptide-binding grooveSelection

Identifiers

PMID33964878
PMCPMC8106206
OpenAlexW3162700188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.