Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33964858›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021

Post-diagnostic reliance on plant-compared with animal-based foods and all-cause mortality in omnivorous long-term colorectal cancer survivors.

Ilka Ratjen, Janna Enderle, Greta Burmeister, Manja Koch, Ute Nöthlings, Jochen Hampe, Wolfgang Lieb

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ilka RatjenInstitute of Epidemiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2642-371X
Janna EnderleInstitute of Epidemiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Greta BurmeisterDepartment of General, Visceral, Vascular, and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Manja KochDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ute NöthlingsNutritional Epidemiology, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5789-2252
Jochen HampeMedical Department 1, University Hospital Dresden, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Wolfgang LiebInstitute of Epidemiology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEHarvard University · USTechnische Universität Dresden · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Rostock · DE

Funding

Proteomics profiling and risk of dementiaK01AG066817 · NIA · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI KOCH, MANJA · 2020 to 2021
$226k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG066817
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlant-rich diets are associated with lower cardiometabolic risks and longer survival in the general population, but their association with mortality in cancer survivors is still unclear.

objectivesWe aimed to examine the associations of 3 postdiagnostic plant-based diet indices with all-cause mortality in omnivorous long-term colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors.

methodsDiet was assessed with FFQs at a median of 6 years after diagnosis in 1404 CRC survivors (56% male; median age, 69 years) in a Northern German prospective cohort study. An overall, a healthful plant-based, and an unhealthful plant-based diet index were derived by scoring intakes of animal foods reversely and intakes of healthy (whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, oils, tea/coffee) and less healthy plant foods (refined grains, fruit juices, sugar-sweetened beverages, potatoes, sweets/desserts) positively or reversely, depending on the index. Vital status follow-up was conducted via population registries. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to estimate HRs for all-cause mortality according to plant-based diet adherence.

resultsWithin 7 years (median) after diet assessment, 204 deaths occurred. The overall plant-based diet index displayed a significant, inverse association with all-cause mortality (HR per 10-point increase in diet index, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91). Although not statistically significant, higher healthful plant-based diet scores showed a strong tendency towards lower mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67-1.01). The unhealthful plant-based diet index was associated with higher mortality, but lost statistical significance after multivariable adjustment (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.48). A subgroup analysis revealed that the tendency towards a positive association of the unhealthful plant-based diet with mortality was restricted to less physically active individuals (<95 metabolic equivalent of task hours/week).

conclusionsAn overall plant-based diet was inversely associated with all-cause mortality in long-term CRC survivors. However, more research is needed to further disentangle the impacts of different qualities of plant-based diets on cancer survivors' health.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsColorectal NeoplasmsDietary ProteinsDiet, VegetarianMortalityAgedAnimalsDietFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMeatMiddle AgedTime FactorsDietary Proteinscolorectal cancerlong-term survivorsmortalityplant-based dietsurvival

Identifiers

PMID33964858
PMCPMC8326049
OpenAlexW3160265253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.