Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33964537›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2021

Children's understanding of epilepsy: A qualitative study.

Jeni Harden, Rebecca Black, Martyn Pickersgill, Jay Shetty, Ailsa McLellan, Celia Brand, Michelle Small, Jane McDonnell, Lorna Clarke, Richard F Chin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeni HardenUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: jeni.harden@ed.ac.uk.
Rebecca BlackUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Martyn PickersgillUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK.
Jay ShettyMuir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Department of Paediatric Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK; Child Life and Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ailsa McLellanMuir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Department of Paediatric Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK; Child Life and Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Celia BrandMuir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Department of Paediatric Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK.
Michelle SmallMuir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Department of Paediatric Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK.
Jane McDonnellBorders General Hospital, Melrose, UK.
Lorna ClarkeBorders General Hospital, Melrose, UK.
Richard F ChinUsher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Muir Maxwell Epilepsy Centre, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, UK; Department of Paediatric Neurosciences, Royal Hospital for Sick Children, Edinburgh, UK; Child Life and Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBBorders General Hospital · GBRoyal Hospital for Children · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S035818/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 209519/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust 217078/Z/19/AWellcome Trust 218471/Z/19/ZWellcome Trust WT106612MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo use a qualitative research approach to determine children's understandings of epilepsy and their epilepsy treatment.

methodsChildren aged 7-16 years with physician-confirmed active epilepsy (i.e., having had an epileptic seizure in the past year and or currently taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and not known to have an intellectual disability, were invited to participate. Children had semi-structured interviews separately on two occasions. Between the first and second interviews, an observation of a routine epilepsy clinic appointment of individual children was conducted, and was then discussed during the second interview. Participatory research tools were used in both child interviews to facilitate discussions. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed, pseudonymized and entered into NVivo (version 12, QSR International). Data were analyzed using a thematic approach.

resultsTwenty-three children of mean age 10.1 years (range 8-14), mean duration of epilepsy of 4.6 years (range 2-10) were enrolled. Twelve were 12 female; 7 had focal, 14 had generalized, and 2 had combined epilepsy; 20 were on monotherapy; and 16 had tried previous AEDs. All had an initial (first) interview; 20 were observed during a clinic appointment and had a second interview. Five broad themes emerged: understanding of epilepsy; understanding of seizures; understanding of medication; understanding of children's role in clinical appointments; influences on children's understanding. Children spoke about what epilepsy meant by describing the physical sensations of having a seizure or through the act of taking medication. Children described the role they had, or felt they should have, but reported challenges in being meaningfully involved in clinical appointments. While healthcare professionals were initial information nodes, epilepsy information from parents appeared to be more significant for children.

conclusionsThe perspectives of children with epilepsy are valuable for clinicians to understand; assumptions should not be made that children's views can be accessed via parents. Clinicians need to be constantly aware of children's views and ways of understanding and communicating about their epilepsy. To support this, the research - drawing on children's words, meanings, and stories - was used to inform an easily accessible, gender-neutral, animation about epilepsy that provides information about the condition, seizures, and medication (https://youtu.be/MO7xXL2ZXP8).

Indexed as

EpilepsyParentsAdolescentAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChildFamilyFemaleHumansQualitative ResearchAnimationChildrenEpilepsyInformationQualitativeUnderstanding

Identifiers

PMID33964537
PMCPMC8259124
OpenAlexW3157983134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.