ArticleJournal of autism and developmental disorders2022
Cognitive and Electrophysiological Correlates of Working Memory Impairments in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.
Article in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Executive Function Outcomes in Pediatric Central Nervous System Tumor Survivors.Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2026Pooled it
- Social Communication in Ras Pathway Disorders: A Comprehensive Review From Genetics to Behavior in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 and Noonan Syndrome.Biological psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of intellectual, neuropsychological, and psychoeducational functioning in neurofibromatosis type 1.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2022Pooled it
- Is cognitive profiling in NF1 still optional? A systematic review of current assessment practices.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Non-invasive brain stimulation modulates GABAergic activity in neurofibromatosis 1.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- A Systematic Review of Functional Brain Imaging Studies in Neurofibromatosis 1.Neuropsychology review · 2026Review
- Disrupted Frontoparietal Dynamics in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Reduced Sensitivity and Atypical Modulation During Working Memory.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Review
- Value of P300 amplitude in the diagnosis of untreated first-episode schizophrenia and psychosis risk syndrome in children and adolescents.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Aberrant oscillatory activity in neurofibromatosis type 1: an EEG study of resting state and working memory.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2023Article
- Using a semi-automated approach to quantify Unidentified Bright Objects in Neurofibromatosis type 1 and linkages to cognitive and academic outcomes.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2023Article
- Repetitive Anodal TDCS to the Frontal Cortex Increases the P300 during Working Memory Processing.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Neuroanatomical correlates of working memory performance in Neurofibromatosis 1.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Assessing Psychiatric Comorbidity and Pharmacologic Treatment Patterns Among Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 1.Cureus · 2021Article
- AtypicalGenes · 2021Review
- The Impact of Age-Related Hearing Loss on Working Memory among Older Individuals: An Event-Related Potential Study.Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extraArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is a single gene disorder associated with working Memory (WM) impairments. The aim of this study was to investigate P300 event-related potential (ERP) associated with WM in NF1. Sixteen adolescents with NF1 were compared with controls on measures of WM and EEG was recorded during a WM nback task. The NF1 group showed poorer performance on measures of WM as compared to the control group. No group differences were observed in P300 amplitude at Pz, but P300 latency was shorter in the NF1 group. Topographic analyses of P300 amplitude showed group differences indicating neural processing differences in the NF1 group relative to controls, which possibly contribute to the cognitive deficits seen in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.