Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963869›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

ProteoSign v2: a faster and evolved user-friendly online tool for statistical analyses of differential proteomics.

Evangelos Theodorakis, Andreas N Antonakis, Ismini Baltsavia, Georgios A Pavlopoulos, Martina Samiotaki, Grigoris D Amoutzias, Theodosios Theodosiou, Oreste Acuto, Georgios Efstathiou, Ioannis Iliopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Microbial Omics.Progress in molecular and subcellular biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CURTAIN-A unique web-based tool for exploration and sharing of MS-based proteomics data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Evangelos TheodorakisDivision of Basic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion 71110, Greece.
Andreas N AntonakisDivision of Basic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion 71110, Greece.
Ismini BaltsaviaDivision of Basic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion 71110, Greece.
Georgios A PavlopoulosInstitute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, BSRC "Alexander Fleming", 34 Fleming Street, 16672 Vari, Greece.
Martina SamiotakiInstitute for Bioinnovation, BSRC "Alexander Fleming", 34 Fleming Street, 16672 Vari, Greece.
Grigoris D AmoutziasBioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, University of Thessaly, Larisa 41500, Greece.
Theodosios TheodosiouDivision of Basic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion 71110, Greece.
Oreste AcutoSir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX13RE, UK.
Georgios EfstathiouDivision of Basic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion 71110, Greece.
Ioannis IliopoulosDivision of Basic Sciences, University of Crete Medical School, Heraklion 71110, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9079-0565

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bottom-up proteomics analyses have been proved over the last years to be a powerful tool in the characterization of the proteome and are crucial for understanding cellular and organism behaviour. Through differential proteomic analysis researchers can shed light on groups of proteins or individual proteins that play key roles in certain, normal or pathological conditions. However, several tools for the analysis of such complex datasets are powerful, but hard-to-use with steep learning curves. In addition, some other tools are easy to use, but are weak in terms of analytical power. Previously, we have introduced ProteoSign, a powerful, yet user-friendly open-source online platform for protein differential expression/abundance analysis designed with the end-proteomics user in mind. Part of Proteosign's power stems from the utilization of the well-established Linear Models For Microarray Data (LIMMA) methodology. Here, we present a substantial upgrade of this computational resource, called ProteoSign v2, where we introduce major improvements, also based on user feedback. The new version offers more plot options, supports additional experimental designs, analyzes updated input datasets and performs a gene enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed proteins. We also introduce the deployment of the Docker technology and significantly increase the speed of a full analysis. ProteoSign v2 is available at http://bioinformatics.med.uoc.gr/ProteoSign.

Indexed as

SoftwareData Interpretation, StatisticalInternetMass SpectrometryProteinsProteomicsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33963869
PMCPMC8262687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.