Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963745›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of clinical nutrition2021

Dietary patterns and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a population-based case-control study in southern China.

Tingting Huang, Alexander Ploner, Ellen T Chang, Qing Liu, Yonglin Cai, Zhe Zhang, Guomin Chen, Qihong Huang, Shanghang Xie, Sumei Cao and 11 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A novel causal model for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2022
    Article
  14. Functional Roles of JNK and p38 MAPK Signaling in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Tingting HuangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2314-4448
Alexander PlonerDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5042-8326
Ellen T ChangCenter for Health Sciences, Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Qing LiuDepartment of Cancer Prevention Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Yonglin CaiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, PR China.
Zhe ZhangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China.
Guomin ChenState Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, PR China.
Qihong HuangSihui Cancer Institute, Sihui, Guangdong, PR China.
Shanghang XieDepartment of Cancer Prevention Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Sumei CaoDepartment of Cancer Prevention Center, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Weihua JiaState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine & Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Yuming ZhengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wuzhou Red Cross Hospital, Wuzhou, Guangxi, PR China.
Jian LiaoCangwu Institute for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Control and Prevention, Wuzhou, Guangxi, PR China.
Yufeng ChenDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Longde LinKey Laboratory of High-Incidence-Tumor Prevention & Treatment (Guangxi Medical University), Ministry of Education, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China.
Ingemar ErnbergDepartment of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6518-1648
Guangwu HuangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-7376-5691
Yi ZengState Key Laboratory for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, PR China.
Yixin ZengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China & Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine & Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, Guangdong, PR China.
Hans-Olov AdamiDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Weimin YeDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNKarolinska Institutet · SEWuzhou University · CNCancer Prevention Institute of California · USFujian Medical University · CNHarvard University · USTumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CN

Funding

Gene-environment EBV Interactions in the Etiology of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma (NPR01CA115873 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI ADAMI, HANS-OLOV · 2008 to 2013
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA115873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary factors, such as consumption of preserved foods, fresh vegetables, and fruits, have been linked to the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, little is known about associations between dietary patterns and the risk of NPC in NPC-endemic areas.

objectivesWe aimed to evaluate whether dietary patterns are associated with NPC risk.

methodsWe studied 2554 newly diagnosed NPC patients aged 20-74 y living in 3 endemic regions of southern China, and 2648 population-based controls frequency-matched to case patients by age, sex, and region, between 2010 and 2014. Dietary components were derived from food frequency data in adulthood and adolescence using principal component analysis. Four dietary components were identified and highly similar in adulthood and adolescence. We used multivariable unconditional logistic regression to calculate ORs with 95% CIs for the association between dietary patterns and NPC risk.

resultsCompared with the lowest quartile, individuals in the highest quartile of the "plant-based factor" in adulthood had a 52% (OR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.38, 0.59) decreased risk of NPC, and those in the highest quartile of the "animal-based factor" had a >2-fold (OR: 2.26; 95% CI: 1.85, 2.77) increased risk, with a monotonic dose-response trend (P-trend < 0.0001). Similar but weaker associations were found in adolescence. High intakes of the "preserved-food factor" were associated with increased NPC risk in both periods, although stronger associations were found in adolescence. Results from joint analysis and sensitivity analyses indicated that dietary factors in adulthood might be more stable and robust predictors of NPC risk than those in adolescence.

conclusionsOur results deliver compelling evidence that plant- and animal-based dietary factors are associated with NPC risk, and provide more insights on the associations of diets and cancer risk that may assist healthy diet recommendations.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesChinaDietHumansNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsRisk Factorsanimal-based factordietary patternsnasopharyngeal carcinomaplant-based factorpopulation-based case-control studypreserved-food factorrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID33963745
PMCPMC8326029
OpenAlexW3157122379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.