Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963458›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2021

Bridging the gap: a pre-post feasibility study of embedding exercise therapy into a co-located cancer unit.

Amy M Dennett, Bernadette Zappa, Rachel Wong, Stephen B Ting, Kimberley Williams, Casey L Peiris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Facilitators to the implementation of exercise into cancer care: a systematic review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementation of a Standard Care Program of Therapeutic Exercise in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Clinician's perspectives of implementing exercise-based rehabilitation in a cancer unit: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy M DennettSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University and Allied Health Clinical Research Office, Eastern Health, Level 2, 5 Arnold St, Box Hill, VIC, Australia. amy.dennett@easternhealth.org.au.
Bernadette ZappaNorth Eastern Melbourne Cancer Services and Department of Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.
Rachel WongDepartment of Oncology, Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stephen B TingDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Eastern Health and Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Kimberley WilliamsDepartment of Physiotherapy, Specialty Medicine and Ambulatory Care, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC, Australia.
Casey L PeirisSchool of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo establish the feasibility of embedding a flexible, exercise-based rehabilitation program into a cancer treatment unit to allow cancer survivors early exercise support.

methodA pre-post study was conducted using Bowen's Framework to describe key domains of feasibility: demand (referrals), acceptability (uptake, attendance, satisfaction), implementation (resources), practicality (adverse events, costs) and limited-efficacy (function, quality of life, self-efficacy). Participants were medically stable, adult cancer survivors receiving curative or palliative treatment for cancer at the health service. Participants completed an 8-week home or hospital-based exercise program. Data were analysed descriptively. Standardised mean differences (Hedge's g) and mean differences were calculated to determine effect size and clinical significance.

resultsThe exercise-based rehabilitation service received 155 referrals over 6 months. Of those eligible, 73/119 (61%) commenced. Participants opting for twice-weekly, hospital-based exercise attended 9/16 (56%) sessions. Participants reported high satisfaction and there were no major adverse events. The program utilised existing resources, with the predominant cost being staff. The average health service cost per participant was AUD $1,104. Participants made clinically significant gains in function (6-min walk distance; + 73 m, 95% confidence interval 49 to 96) and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 Global quality of life; + 8 units, 95% confidence interval 3 to 13).

conclusionImplementation of exercise-based rehabilitation in a co-located cancer unit was safe and feasible. Access, patient and staff education and establishing funding streams are important implementation considerations. Implications for cancer survivors Access to exercise in a cancer unit provides opportunity for early intervention to optimise function during treatment.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsQuality of LifeAdultExerciseExercise TherapyFeasibility StudiesHumansExerciseReferralsRehabilitationSurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID33963458
PMCPMC8105143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.