Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963405›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2021

Evidence for a Syncytial Origin of Eukaryotes from Ancestral State Reconstruction.

Josip Skejo, Sriram G Garg, Sven B Gould, Michael Hendriksen, Fernando D K Tria, Nico Bremer, Damjan Franjević, Neil W Blackstone, William F Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. A phase oscillator model of cell cycles reveals nuclear density control in a branched fungal network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josip SkejoInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2554-4499
Sriram G GargInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4160-5228
Sven B GouldInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michael HendriksenInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Fernando D K TriaInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4291-2115
Nico BremerInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Damjan FranjevićFaculty of Science, Division of Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Zagreb, Evolution Lab, Zagreb, Croatia.
Neil W BlackstoneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA.
William F MartinInstitute for Molecular Evolution, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern accounts of eukaryogenesis entail an endosymbiotic encounter between an archaeal host and a proteobacterial endosymbiont, with subsequent evolution giving rise to a unicell possessing a single nucleus and mitochondria. The mononucleate state of the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) is seldom, if ever, questioned, even though cells harboring multiple (syncytia, coenocytes, and polykaryons) are surprisingly common across eukaryotic supergroups. Here, we present a survey of multinucleated forms. Ancestral character state reconstruction for representatives of 106 eukaryotic taxa using 16 different possible roots and supergroup sister relationships, indicate that LECA, in addition to being mitochondriate, sexual, and meiotic, was multinucleate. LECA exhibited closed mitosis, which is the rule for modern syncytial forms, shedding light on the mechanics of its chromosome segregation. A simple mathematical model shows that within LECA's multinucleate cytosol, relationships among mitochondria and nuclei were neither one-to-one, nor one-to-many, but many-to-many, placing mitonuclear interactions and cytonuclear compatibility at the evolutionary base of eukaryotic cell origin. Within a syncytium, individual nuclei and individual mitochondria function as the initial lower-level evolutionary units of selection, as opposed to individual cells, during eukaryogenesis. Nuclei within a syncytium rescue each other's lethal mutations, thereby postponing selection for viable nuclei and cytonuclear compatibility to the generation of spores, buffering transitional bottlenecks at eukaryogenesis. The prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition is traditionally thought to have left no intermediates, yet if eukaryogenesis proceeded via a syncytial common ancestor, intermediate forms have persisted to the present throughout the eukaryotic tree as syncytia but have so far gone unrecognized.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEukaryotaArchaeaEukaryotic CellsPhylogenyProkaryotic Cellscoenocyteendosymbiosiseukaryogenesismeiosismitosissyncytiumunits of selection

Identifiers

PMID33963405
PMCPMC8290118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.