Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963388›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2021

Diagnosis delayed: health profile differences between women with undiagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome and those with a clinical diagnosis by age 35 years.

Renae C Fernandez, Vivienne M Moore, Alice R Rumbold, Melissa J Whitrow, Jodie C Avery, Michael J Davies

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renae C FernandezThe University of Adelaide, Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-2989
Vivienne M MooreThe University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Alice R RumboldRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Melissa J WhitrowThe University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Jodie C AveryRobinson Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8857-9162
Michael J DaviesThe University of Adelaide, Discipline of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionAre reproductive, metabolic or psychological health profiles of women with clinically diagnosed polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) different from those with undiagnosed PCOS? SUMMARY ANSWER: Obtaining a clinical diagnosis of PCOS is strongly linked to the experience of fertility problems, but not clinical depression or poor metabolic health, although these were highly prevalent in women with PCOS irrespective of when they were diagnosed. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PCOS is an endocrine disorder that is relative common, but heterogeneous in presentation. This may impact on the pathways to diagnosis and timely treatment. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional analysis of a community-based cohort of 974 women, established retrospectively when women were around 30 years of age. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsIn this cohort of women born in Adelaide, South Australia, half of women who met the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS were previously undiagnosed. We compared women with prior clinical diagnosis of PCOS, those diagnosed through participation in this research, and the remainder in the cohort. Sociodemographic characteristics, reproductive, metabolic and psychological health, including medical conditions and medications were considered. Logistic regression was undertaken to identify independent predictors of prior clinical diagnosis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 56 women with a prior clinical diagnosis of PCOS (5.7%) and a further 64 (6.6%) were undiagnosed until study entry. The great majority of women with a prior diagnosis of PCOS reported having had problems with periods (95%) and excess body hair (63%). Corresponding proportions for women undiagnosed until study participation were slightly lower (81% and 45%, respectively). Although the proportion of women attempting or achieving pregnancy was similar across all groups, those with a prior diagnosis of PCOS were four times more likely to have reported difficulties becoming pregnant than those undiagnosed (odds ratio = 4.05, 95% CI 1.74-9.45) and frequently sought medical assistance. Metabolic problems were higher in both PCOS groups compared to women without PCOS. In both PCOS groups, the prevalence of clinical depression was 50% higher than in those with no PCOS (P = 0.021). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The number of women who were diagnosed with PCOS both prior to and during the study limited statistical power available to detect modest differences between the PCOS groups. Some women in the group classified as not having PCOS may have remained undiagnosed, but any bias from this source would contribute to more conservative findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsFindings reinforce the need for early detection of PCOS symptoms from adolescence, ensuring timely diagnosis and appropriate health care. The high prevalence of depression among clinically diagnosed and undiagnosed women with PCOS suggests this is a feature of the condition and supports recent recommendations in the international PCOS guidelines to screen all women with PCOS for depression and anxiety. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was supported by a project grant (2017) from the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Centre for Research Excellence in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (Grant ID APP1078444). R.C.F. and J.C.A. were supported by Robinson Research Institute Lloyd Cox Career Development Fellowships (2018). Establishment of the cohort was funded by an NHMRC Strategic Award No. 465455, a Career Development Award in Population Health (No. 349548) and the Australian Research Council (Future Fellowship FT100101018) awarded to M.J.D. All authors declared no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeAdolescentAdultAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesDelayed DiagnosisFemaleHumansPregnancyRetrospective Studiesdepressiondiagnosisinfertilitypolycystic ovary syndromereproductive health

Identifiers

PMID33963388
PMCPMC8289294
OpenAlexW3157626024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.