Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963385›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

Label3DMaize: toolkit for 3D point cloud data annotation of maize shoots.

Teng Miao, Weiliang Wen, Yinglun Li, Sheng Wu, Chao Zhu, Xinyu Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning for three-dimensional (3D) plant phenomics.Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teng MiaoCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Dongling Road, Shenhe District, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110161, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8326-3313
Weiliang WenBeijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, 11#Shuguang Huayuan Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7184-5121
Yinglun LiNational Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, 11#Shuguang Huayuan Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0138-9057
Sheng WuBeijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, 11#Shuguang Huayuan Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8542-5531
Chao ZhuCollege of Information and Electrical Engineering, Shenyang Agricultural University, Dongling Road, Shenhe District, Liaoning Province, Shenyang 110161, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0875-4646
Xinyu GuoBeijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, 11#Shuguang Huayuan Middle Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100097, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7282-7379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 3D point cloud is the most direct and effective data form for studying plant structure and morphology. In point cloud studies, the point cloud segmentation of individual plants to organs directly determines the accuracy of organ-level phenotype estimation and the reliability of the 3D plant reconstruction. However, highly accurate, automatic, and robust point cloud segmentation approaches for plants are unavailable. Thus, the high-throughput segmentation of many shoots is challenging. Although deep learning can feasibly solve this issue, software tools for 3D point cloud annotation to construct the training dataset are lacking.

resultsWe propose a top-to-down point cloud segmentation algorithm using optimal transportation distance for maize shoots. We apply our point cloud annotation toolkit for maize shoots, Label3DMaize, to achieve semi-automatic point cloud segmentation and annotation of maize shoots at different growth stages, through a series of operations, including stem segmentation, coarse segmentation, fine segmentation, and sample-based segmentation. The toolkit takes ∼4-10 minutes to segment a maize shoot and consumes 10-20% of the total time if only coarse segmentation is required. Fine segmentation is more detailed than coarse segmentation, especially at the organ connection regions. The accuracy of coarse segmentation can reach 97.2% that of fine segmentation.

conclusionLabel3DMaize integrates point cloud segmentation algorithms and manual interactive operations, realizing semi-automatic point cloud segmentation of maize shoots at different growth stages. The toolkit provides a practical data annotation tool for further online segmentation research based on deep learning and is expected to promote automatic point cloud processing of various plants.

Indexed as

Data CurationZea maysAlgorithmsReproducibility of ResultsSoftware3D point clouddata annotationLabel3DMaizemaize shootsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID33963385
PMCPMC8105162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.