Trial reportScientific reports2021
Development of a valid Chinese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Chinese-speaking patients with chronic ankle instability disorders.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient-reported evolution of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool after arthroscopic anatomic lateral ligament reconstruction: A retrospective study of 134 cases.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Fu's subcutaneous needling versus bracing combined with exercise therapy in the treatment of postacute lateral ankle sprain and the prevention of chronic ankle instability: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Limited incremental value of balance and plantar-pressure measures beyond baseline CAIT for a 12-month composite ankle-instability outcome in competitive badminton players.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) demonstrates comparable predictive validity to Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) for return to sport after anatomic ankle ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Cutoff Score Determination of the Turkish Version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Recreationally Active Individuals.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of the antecedents affecting coping questionnaire in patients with multiple sclerosis.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Effect of Hop-Stabilization Training on Ankle Instability and Function of Adolescent Female Basketball Players with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Double-Blind, Prospective, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Kinematic and muscle synergy patterns of the lower limbs during jump-landing with side-cutting in individuals with functional ankle instability.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Development and validation of the clinical judgment capability questionnaire in nurses: A sequential exploratory mixed method study.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Applicability of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool in Elite Volleyball Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Development and Validation of the Companion's Satisfaction Questionnaire of Patient's Hospitalized in Intensive Care Units.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2024Article
- Translation and validation of a simplified Chinese version of the psychosocial assessment tool.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Effect of strength training with additional acupuncture on balance, ankle sensation, and isokinetic muscle strength in chronic ankle instability among college students.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Translation and validation of the simplified Chinese version of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory-42.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Translation and Validation of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Quality of Life Questionnaire.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the ankle joint functional assessment tool (AJFAT) questionnaire.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2023Article
- The Prevalence and Characteristics of Chronic Ankle Instability in Elite Athletes of Different Sports: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As an effective scale for the condition assessment of patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI), the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) is the most widely used scale, and its original version is written in English. Therefore, the purpose of our study is to apply the CAIT to Chinese patients and evaluate its responsiveness, reliability, and validity in terms of Chinese patients with CAI. First, we adapted the CAIT into the Chinese edition (CAIT-C), through which cross-cultural adaptation and translation can be carried out in a five-step procedure. Next, recruited patients completed the three periods of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), CAIT-C, and the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36) scales. Afterward, to assess the responsiveness, reliability, and validity, we calculated the standardized response mean (SRM), effect size (ES), Spearman's correlation coefficient (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.