Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963080›Full record

Observational studyOpen heart2021

Impact of emergency medical service delays on time to reperfusion and mortality in STEMI.

Ahmad Alrawashdeh, Ziad Nehme, Brett Williams, Karen Smith, Angela Brennan, Diem T Dinh, Danny Liew, Jeffrey Lefkovits, Dion Stub

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Open heart, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Recent Advances of Mobile Healthcare in Cardiology Practice.Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad AlrawashdehDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2458-8200
Ziad NehmeDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Brett WilliamsDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Karen SmithDepartment of Paramedicine, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.
Angela BrennanSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Diem T DinhSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Danny LiewSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jeffrey LefkovitsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Dion StubSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia d.stub@alfred.org.au.ORCID 0000-0001-8686-2709
Monash University · AUAmbulance Victoria · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUJordan University of Science and Technology · JOThe Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the relationship between emergency medical service (EMS) delay time, overall time to reperfusion and clinical outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study of 2976 patients with STEMI who presented to EMS and underwent PPCI between January 2014 and December 2017. We performed multivariable logistic models to assess the relationship between EMS delay time and 30-day mortality and to identify factors associated with system delay time.

resultsEMS delay time accounted for the first half of total system delay (median=59 min (IQR=48-77)). Compared with those who survived, those who died had longer median EMS delay times (59 (IQR=11-74) vs 74 (IQR=57-98), p<0.001). EMS delay time was independently associated with a higher risk of mortality (adjusted OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40, for every 30 min increase), largely driven by complicated patients with cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Independent predictors of longer EMS delay times were older age, women, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, prehospital notification and intensive care management. Although longer EMS delay times were associated with shorter door-to-balloon times, total system delay times increased with increasing EMS delay times.

conclusionIncreasing EMS delay times, particularly those result from haemodynamic complications, increase total time to reperfusion and are associated with 30-day mortality after STEMI. All efforts should be made to monitor and reduce EMS delay times for timely reperfusion and better outcome.

Indexed as

Time-to-TreatmentAgedElectrocardiographyEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRetrospective StudiesST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime Factorsmyocardial infarctionpercutaneous coronary interventiontelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID33963080
PMCPMC8108686
OpenAlexW3159822212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.