Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33963004›Full record

Trial reportArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2021

Interface leakage during neonatal CPAP treatment: a randomised, cross-over trial.

Markus Falk, Kolbrun Gunnarsdottir, Sonja Baldursdottir, Snorri Donaldsson, Baldvin Jonsson, Thomas Drevhammar

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Incidence of nasal pressure injury in preterm infants on nasal mask noninvasive ventilation.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2023
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus FalkDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden markus.falk@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-5039
Kolbrun GunnarsdottirDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sonja BaldursdottirDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Snorri DonaldssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Baldvin JonssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas DrevhammarDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4038-2221
Karolinska University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine leakage for two neonatal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) interfaces and evaluate leak-corrective manoeuvres.

designThe ToNIL (Trial of NCPAP Interface Leakage) study was a randomised, clinical, cross-over trial with data collection between August 2018 and October 2019. The primary outcome was blinded to the treating staff.

settingOne secondary, 8-bed neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and three larger (>15 beds), academic NICU referral centres. PATIENTS: Newborn infants with CPAP were screened (n=73), and those with stable spontaneous breathing, low oxygen requirement, postmenstrual age (PMA) over 28 weeks and no comorbidities were eligible. In total, 50 infants were included (median PMA 33 completed weeks).

interventionsLeakage was measured for both prongs and nasal mask, before and after leak-corrective manoeuvres. Interface application was performed in a randomised order by a nurse, blinded to the measured leakage.

main outcome measures30 s average leakage, measured in litres per minute (LPM).

resultsAnalyses showed a significantly lower leakage (mean difference 0.86 LPM, 95% CI 0.07 to 1.65) with prongs (median 2.01 LPM, IQR 1.00-2.80) than nasal mask (median 2.45 LPM, IQR 0.99-5.11). Leak-corrective manoeuvres reduced leakage significantly for both prongs (median 1.22 LPM, IQR 0.54-1.87) and nasal mask (median 2.35 LPM, IQR 0.76-4.75).

conclusionsLarge leakages were common for both interfaces, less with prongs. Simple care manoeuvres reduced leakage for both interfaces. This is the first report of absolute leakage for nasal interfaces and should encourage further studies on leakage during CPAP treatment.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureInfant CareMasksCross-Over StudiesEquipment FailureFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMaleOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRespiratory Distress Syndrome, Newbornneonatologyresuscitationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID33963004
PMCPMC8543197
OpenAlexW3159010153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.