ArticleBMJ case reports2021
Complications associated with intrathecal drug delivery in a paediatric patient with Niemann-Pick type C.
Article in BMJ case reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing synaptic vesicle release and recycling with antibody shuttle for targeted delivery of therapeutics to neurons.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the landscape of pharmacodynamic biomarkers in Niemann-Pick Disease Type C (NPC).Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report on a male subject with a diagnosis of Niemann-Pick type C (NPC). He received an experimental medicinal product intrathecally initially via lumbar puncture (LP) and eventually via intrathecal drug delivery device. Shortly after implantation, the device catheter migrated outside of the intrathecal space and coiled subcutaneously. The treatment continued via LP after removal of the device. A subdural haematoma developed after repeated LPs. It was surgically evacuated and the patient recovered with sequelae. Surgically implanted drug delivery devices are designed to bypass the blood-brain barrier and deliver a medicinal product directly into the cerebrospinal fluid circulation. Their use has extended into the field of neurodegenerative disorders. Significant adverse events can occur at any given time after implantation including neurological injury, dislodgement or displacement of any of its components, infection and drug-related complications; all can significantly affect the quality of life of patients. Repeated LPs also carry significant risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.