Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33962662›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2021

Illness perceptions of adults with eczematous skin diseases: a systematic mixed studies review.

Marc Rocholl, Michaela Ludewig, Carola Brakemeier, Swen Malte John, Annika Wilke

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marc RochollInstitute for Health Research and Education, Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhuegel 7a, 49076, Osnabrueck, Germany. mrocholl@uni-osnabrueck.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-0161
Michaela LudewigInstitute for Health Research and Education, Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhuegel 7a, 49076, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Carola BrakemeierInstitute for Interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhuegel 7a, 49076, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Swen Malte JohnInstitute for Health Research and Education, Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhuegel 7a, 49076, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Annika WilkeInstitute for Health Research and Education, Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrueck, Am Finkenhuegel 7a, 49076, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Osnabrück University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEczematous skin diseases, e.g., atopic dermatitis or contact dermatitis, are associated with a high disease burden, a significant impact on quality of life and a higher risk for anxiety and depression. Therefore, coping strategies are of interest. In order to understand coping processes, it is necessary to examine the patients' perspectives on their illness. The aim of this systematic mixed studies review is to investigate the illness perceptions of patients with eczematous skin diseases to get a better understanding of their coping processes.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, The Cochrane Library, PsycInfo, PSYNDEX, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus until February 20, 2019. Both qualitative and quantitative studies were included in the review. Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and carried out a narrative synthesis. We assessed study quality with the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

resultsThree qualitative and four quantitative studies were included in the systematic review. We found different methodological approaches for investigating illness perceptions: guided interviews, focus group interviews as well as standardized questionnaires, e.g., the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire. All studies report suspected causes of the skin disease, such as endogenous and exogenous causes (namely, psychological or occupational factors). We found long timeline beliefs as well as various perceived and experienced social, economic, and psychological consequences. Our analysis reveals complex emotional representations in patients with eczematous skin diseases, in particular impairment of emotional well-being, and feelings of shame or helplessness. Qualitative and quantitative data were predominantly complementary and convergent.

conclusionPatients with eczematous skin diseases have complex illness representations regarding their disease. These representations interrelate with the coping behavior of patients. Therefore, medical professionals should consider them for counseling and treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018109217 .

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicQuality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultHumansMental HealthPerceptionAtopic dermatitisContact dermatitisEczemaIllness perceptionsSelf-regulation modelSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID33962662
PMCPMC8106167
OpenAlexW3157422705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.