Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33962656›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

Monitoring of patients with microdialysis following pancreaticoduodenectomy-the MINIMUM study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Espen Lindholm, Nil Ekiz, Tor Inge Tønnessen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03631173 (Monitoring of patIents With Microdialysis Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy - a Randomized Controlled Trial. THE MINIMUM STUDY), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03631173 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Monitoring of patIents With Microdialysis Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy - a Randomized Controlled Trial. THE MINIMUM STUDY

TypeinterventionalSponsorOslo University HospitalRan2019 to 2028Enrolled201ConditionsPancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Biliary Tract Cancer, Duodenal CancerArmsSurgical og radiological intervention, antibiotics
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Espen LindholmDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Nil EkizDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Tor Inge TønnessenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postboks 4950 Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. t.i.tonnessen@medisin.uio.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3511-5815
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Helse Sør-Øst RHF 2016115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy is a much-feared complication associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. The current standard for diagnosing postoperative pancreatic fistula, besides routine clinical examination, include radiological examinations, analysis of pancreatic drain amylase activity, and routine blood samples. Another promising method is by intraperitoneal microdialysis to monitor intraperitoneal metabolites measured at the pancreaticojejunostomy, thereby detecting what occurs locally, before chemical events can be reflected as measurable changes in systemic blood levels.

methodsThe MINIMUM study is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single center enrolling 200 patients scheduled for open pancreatoduodenectomy comparing the microdialysis method to the "standard of care." Half of the included patients will be randomized to receive an intraperitoneal microdialysis catheter implanted at the end of surgery and will be monitored by microdialysis as an additional monitoring tool. The other half of the patients will not receive a microdialysis catheter and will be monitored according to the current standard of care. The primary objective is to evaluate if the microdialysis method can reduce the total length of stay at the hospital. Secondary endpoints are the frequency of complications, length of stay at the hospital at our institution, catheter malfunction, number of infections and bleeding episodes caused by the microdialysis catheter, patient-reported quality of life and pain, and cost per patient undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. The patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio. DISCUSSION: Intraabdominal microdialysis could potentially reduce morbidity and mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy. Furthermore, there is a great potential for shortening the in-hospital length of stay and reducing the financial aspect considerably. This study may potentially open the possibility for using microdialysis as standard monitoring in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy. The hypothesis is that the microdialysis method compared to "standard care" will reduce the total length of hospital stay.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03631173 ). Registered on 7 September 2018 under the name: "Monitoring of patients With Microdialysis Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy". Based on protocol version 19-1, dated 15th January 2019.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyQuality of LifeHumansMicrodialysisPancreatic FistulaPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnastomotic leakageMicrodialysisPancreatoduodenectomyPostoperative pancreatic fistula

Identifiers

PMID33962656
PMCPMC8105916
OpenAlexW3159119981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.