ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2021
Assessing healthcare access using the Levesque's conceptual framework- a scoping review.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 148 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
148 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Barriers and facilitators of accessing primary healthcare for patients with severe mental illness: a mixed-methods systematic review using framework synthesis.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- An investigation into telemedicine utilization for refugee mental health: a systematic review.Globalization and health · 2025Pooled it
- Access and use of general and mental health services before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators to women's access to sexual and reproductive health services in rural Australia: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators of access to maternity care for African-born women living in Australia: a meta-synthesis of qualitative evidence.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- What Interventions Work to Reduce Cost Barriers to Primary Healthcare in High-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024Pooled it
- Geographic and sociodemographic access to systemic anticancer therapies for secondary breast cancer: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Understanding inequalities in access to adult mental health services in the UK: a systematic mapping review.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Barriers to cervical cancer and breast cancer screening uptake in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.Health policy and planning · 2023Pooled it
- Understanding patient barriers and enablers to accessing community resources: a qualitative study to inform navigation service delivery.BMC primary care · 2025Trial
- Article
- Navigating Emergency Care After Injury: A Qualitative Study of Asylum Seekers and Refugees in England and Wales Using the Candidacy Framework (BE SURE Study).Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Brief Healthcare Insecurity Scale in a Sample of US Adults Living With and Without HIV.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2026Article
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing the European code of cancer practice in a rural and coastal setting: a qualitative study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- A machine learning analysis of perceived healthcare access barriers among women of reproductive age in Sub-Saharan Africa: using demographic and health surveys.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Living Alone and Routine Checkup Disparities Among Older Adults With Disabilities in the United States: The Mediating Role of Social Determinants of Health.Journal of aging and health · 2026Article
- Assessment of Barriers to Dental Care Among Children in Saudi Arabia Using Levesque's Framework: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- State HIV Prevention Policy Environments and HIV Prevention Outcomes: Racial and Ethnic Differences in the United States.AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Medical deserts and uneven access: a U.S.-anchored critical conceptual review.International journal for equity in health · 2026Review
- Barriers to outpatient mental health services experienced by adult Medicaid recipients: a scoping review protocol.JBI evidence synthesis · 2026Article
88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCountries are working hard to improve access to healthcare through Universal Healthcare Coverage. To genuinely address the problems of healthcare access, we need to recognize all the dimensions and complexities of healthcare access. Levesque's Conceptual Framework of Access to Health introduced in 2013 provides an interesting and comprehensive perspective through the five dimensions of access and the five abilities of the population to access healthcare. The objectives of this paper are to identify and analyze all empirical studies that applied Levesque's conceptual framework for access to healthcare and to explore the experiences and challenges of researchers who used this framework in developing tools for assessing access.
methodsA scoping review was conducted by searching through four databases, for studies citing Levesque et al. 2013 to select all empirical studies focusing on healthcare access that applied the framework. An initial 1838 documents underwent title screening, followed by abstract screening, and finally full text screening by two independent reviewers. Authors of studies identified from the scoping review were also interviewed.
resultsThere were 31 studies identified on healthcare access using the Levesque framework either a priori, to develop assessment tool/s (11 studies), or a posteriori, to organize and analyze collected data (20 studies). From the tools used, 147 unique questions on healthcare access were collected, 91 of these explored dimensions of access while 56 were about abilities to access. Those that were designed from the patient's perspective were 73%, while 20% were for health providers, and 7% were addressed to both. Interviews from seven out of the 26 authors, showed that while there were some challenges such as instances of categorization difficulty and unequal representation of dimensions and abilities, the overall experience was positive.
conclusionLevesque's framework has been successfully used in research that explored, assessed, and measured access in various healthcare services and settings. The framework allowed researchers to comprehensively assess the complex and dynamic process of access both in the health systems and the population contexts. There is still potential room for improvement of the framework, particularly the incorporation of time-related elements of access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.