Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33962053›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2021

A Comparative Study of Real-Time RT-PCR-Based SARS-CoV-2 Detection Methods and Its Application to Human-Derived and Surface Swabbed Material.

Aizhan Tastanova, Corinne Isabelle Stoffel, Andreas Dzung, Phil Fang Cheng, Elisa Bellini, Pål Johansen, Agathe Duda, Stephan Nobbe, Reto Lienhard, Philipp Peter Bosshard and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comprehensive Review on Viral RNA Extraction Strategies for Enhanced Molecular Diagnostics.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Detection and Quantification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the workplace: Key findings from a rapid review of the literature.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aizhan TastanovaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Corinne Isabelle StoffelDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas DzungDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Phil Fang ChengDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Elisa BelliniDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Pål JohansenDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Agathe DudaDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stephan NobbeDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Reto LienhardADMed Microbiologie, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.
Philipp Peter BosshardDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mitchell P LevesqueDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Electronic address: mitchell.levesque@usz.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time RT-PCR remains a gold standard in the detection of various viral diseases. In the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, multiple RT-PCR-based tests were developed to screen for viral infection. As an emergency response to increasing testing demand, we established a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) PCR diagnostics platform for which we compared different commercial and in-house RT-PCR protocols. Four commercial, one customized, and one in-house RT-PCR protocols were evaluated with 92 SARS-CoV-2-positive and 92 SARS-CoV-2-negative samples. Furthermore, economical and practical characteristics of these protocols were compared. In addition, a highly sensitive digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) method was developed, and application of RT-PCR and ddPCR methods on SARS-CoV-2 environmental samples was examined. Very low limits of detection (1 or 2 viral copies/μL), high sensitivities (93.6% to 97.8%), and high specificities (98.7% to 100%) for the tested RT-PCR protocols were found. Furthermore, the feasibility of downscaling two of the commercial protocols, which could optimize testing capacity, was demonstrated. Tested commercial and customized RT-PCR detection kits show very good and comparable sensitivity and specificity, and the kits could be further optimized for use on SARS-CoV-2 viral samples derived from human and surface swabbed samples.

Indexed as

PandemicsCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFeasibility StudiesHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ViralSARS-CoV-2Sensitivity and SpecificitySmartphoneSurface PropertiesSwitzerlandRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33962053
PMCPMC8096526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.