Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961677›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Preparation for airway management in Australia and New Zealand ICUs during the COVID -19 pandemic.

David J Brewster, Christopher P Nickson, Steve McGloughlin, David Pilcher, Vineet V Sarode, Jonathan J Gatward

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Confidence in airway management proficiency: a mixed methods study of intensive care specialists in Australia and New Zealand.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

David J BrewsterIntensive Care Unit, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-1889
Christopher P NicksonIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6968-3087
Steve McGloughlinIntensive Care Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David PilcherCentre for Health Innovation, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Vineet V SarodeIntensive Care Unit, Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan J GatwardIntensive Care Unit, Royal North Shore, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Alfred Health · AUCabrini Hospital · AUAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis paper aimed to describe the airway practices of intensive care units (ICUs) in Australia and New Zealand specific to patients presenting with COVID-19 and to inform whether consistent clinical practice was achieved. Specific clinical airway guidelines were endorsed in March 2020 by the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) and College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). METHODS AND

findingsProspective, structured questionnaire for all ICU directors in Australia and New Zealand was completed by 69 ICU directors after email invitation from ANZICS. The online questionnaire was accessible for three weeks during September 2020 and analysed by cloud-based software. Basic ICU demographics (private or public, metropolitan or rural) and location, purchasing, airway management practices, guideline uptake, checklist and cognitive aid use and staff training relevant to airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic were the main outcome measures. The 69 ICU directors reported significant simulation-based inter-professional airway training of staff (97%), and use of video laryngoscopy (94%), intubation checklists (94%), cognitive aids (83%) and PPE "spotters" (89%) during the airway management of patients with COVID-19. Tracheal intubation was almost always performed by a Specialist (97% of ICUs), who was more likely to be an intensivist than an anaesthetist (61% vs 36%). There was a more frequent adoption of specific airway guidelines for the management of COVID-19 patients in public ICUs (94% vs 71%) and reliance on specialist intensivists to perform intubations in private ICUs (92% vs 53%).

conclusionThere was a high uptake of a standardised approach to airway management in COVID-19 patients in ICUs in Australia and New Zealand, likely due to endorsement of national guidelines.

Indexed as

Airway ManagementAustraliaCOVID-19Guidelines as TopicHumansIntensive Care UnitsNew ZealandPandemicsPersonal Protective EquipmentPhysician ExecutivesProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Surveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33961677
PMCPMC8104394
OpenAlexW3157296568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.