Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961669›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Exposure to e-cigarette TV advertisements among U.S. youth and adults, 2013-2019.

Zongshuan Duan, Yu Wang, Sherry L Emery, Frank J Chaloupka, Yoonsang Kim, Jidong Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Decoding Vaping: Empowering Youth Through Media Literacy Based E-cigarette Educational Program.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Correlates of Perceptions, Use, and Intention to Use Heated Tobacco Products Among US Young Adults in 2020.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zongshuan DuanSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Yu WangSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sherry L EmeryNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Frank J ChaloupkaInstitute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Yoonsang KimNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Jidong HuangSchool of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3425-9155

Funding

Assessing the Intended and Unintended Consequences of E-cigarette TV AdvertisingR01CA194681 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI HUANG, JIDONG · 2015 to 2019
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionE-cigarette advertising has been shown to increase e-cigarette awareness and use. Although e-cigarette marketing in the early 2010s has been well-documented, little is known about how it has changed in recent years in response to the regulatory scrutiny from the FDA and the Congress to combat youth vaping epidemic. This study aims to examine the exposure to e-cigarette TV advertising among youth and adults in the U.S. from 2013 to 2019, overall and by media market and brand.

methodsQuarterly data on e-cigarette TV advertising exposure, measured by target rating points (TRPs), and expenditures from 2013 to 2019 were compiled from the StradegyTM of Kantar Media. Trends of quarterly e-cigarette advertising TRPs were reported by age group, market, and brand.

resultsOver the study period, overall exposure to e-cigarette TV advertising was higher among adults than among youth. E-cigarette advertising TRPs and expenditures were relatively stable, despite intermittent fluctuations, between 2013 Q1 and 2017 Q1 except for a one-time dip in 2015 Q3, followed by a sharp decline in 2017 Q2 and stayed low till the end of 2018. A resurgence of e-cigarette advertising TRPs occurred in 2019 Q1, led by the advertising from JUUL, Blu, and Vuse, which peaked in the third quarter of 2019, with quarterly TRPs reaching 316.8 for youth and 1,701.9 for adults, and quarterly advertising expenditure totaling $31 million.

conclusionsSignificant variations, both over time and across media markets and brands, were observed for e-cigarette televised advertising between 2013 and 2019. Following a lull in TV advertising in 2017/18, major e-cigarette companies have substantially increased advertising of their products on American television since early 2019, resulting in a surge in exposure to e-cigarette advertising among both youth and adults. Our findings highlighted the importance of continued monitoring of e-cigarette advertising in the U.S.

Indexed as

AdvertisingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTelevisionVapingAdolescentAdultChildHumansUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33961669
PMCPMC8104405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.