Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961648›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Effects of light spectrum on morpho-physiological traits of grafted tomato seedlings.

Ahmed F Yousef, Muhammad M Ali, Hafiz M Rizwan, Mohamed A A Ahmed, Waleed M Ali, Hazem M Kalaji, Nabil Elsheery, Jacek Wróbel, Yong Xu, Faxing Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmed F YousefCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-5566
Muhammad M AliCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-6328
Hafiz M RizwanCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Mohamed A A AhmedPlant Production Department (Horticulture-Medicinal and Aromatic Plants), Faculty of Agriculture (Saba Basha), Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Waleed M AliDepartment of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, University of Al-Azhar (Branch Assiut), Assiut, Egypt.
Hazem M KalajiDepartment of Plant Physiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3833-4917
Nabil ElsheeryAgriculture Botany Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Jacek WróbelDepartment of Bioengineering, West Pomeranian University of Technology in Szczecin, Szczecin, Poland.
Yong XuCollege of Mechanical and Electronic Engineering, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.
Faxing ChenCollege of Horticulture, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is already known that there are many factors responsible for the successful grafting process in plants, including light intensity. However, the influence of the spectrum of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) on this process has almost never been tested. During the pre-grafting process tomato seedlings grew for 30 days under 100 μmol m-2 s-1 of mixed LEDs (red 70%+ blue 30%). During the post-grafting period, seedlings grew for 20 days under the same light intensity but the lightening source was either red LED, mixed LEDs (red 70% + blue 30%), blue LED or white fluorescent lamps. This was done to determine which light source(s) could better improve seedling quality and increase grafting success. Our results showed that application of red and blue light mixture (R7:B3) caused significant increase in total leaf area, dry weight (total, shoot and root), total chlorophyll/carotenoid ratio, soluble protein and sugar content. Moreover, this light treatment maintained better photosynthetic performance i.e. more effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry Y(II), better photochemical quenching (qP), and higher electron transport rate (ETR). This can be partially explained by the observed upregulation of gene expression levels of PsaA and PsbA and the parallel protein expression levels. This in turn could lead to better functioning of the photosynthetic apparatus of tomato seedlings and then to faster production of photoassimilate ready to be translocated to various tissues and organs, including those most in need, i.e., involved in the formation of the graft union.

Indexed as

LightPhotosynthesisSeedlingsSolanum lycopersicumCarotenoidsChlorophyllGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant LeavesCarotenoidsChlorophyll

Identifiers

PMID33961648
PMCPMC8104444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.