Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961401›Full record

ArticleAccounts of chemical research2021

Atomistic Polarizable Embeddings: Energy, Dynamics, Spectroscopy, and Reactivity.

Daniele Loco, Louis Lagardère, Olivier Adjoua, Jean-Philip Piquemal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Accounts of chemical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniele LocoLaboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Sorbonne Université, UMR 7616 CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6808-7515
Louis LagardèreLaboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Sorbonne Université, UMR 7616 CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.
Olivier AdjouaLaboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Sorbonne Université, UMR 7616 CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.
Jean-Philip PiquemalLaboratoire de Chimie Théorique, Sorbonne Université, UMR 7616 CNRS, 75005 Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6615-9426

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The computational modeling of realistic extended systems, relevant in, e.g., Chemistry and Biophysics, is a fundamental problem of paramount importance in contemporary research. Enzymatic catalysis and photoinduced processes in pigment-protein complexes are typical problems targeted by computer-aided approaches, to complement experiments as interpretative tools at a molecular scale. The daunting complexity of this task lies in between the opposite stringent requirements of results' reliability for structural/dynamical properties and related intermolecular interactions, and a mandatory principle of realism in the modeling strategy. Therefore, in practice, a truly realistic computational model of a biologically relevant system can easily fail to meet the accuracy requirement, in order to balance the excessive computational cost necessary to reach the desired precision.To address such an "accuracy vs reality" dualistic requirement, mixed quantum mechanics/classical mechanics approaches within Atomistic (i.e., preserving the discrete particle configuration) Polarizable Embeddings (QM/APEs) methods have been proposed over the years. In this Account, we review recent developments in the design and application of general QM/APE methods, targeting situations where a local intrinsically quantum behavior is coupled to a large molecular system (i.e., an environment), often involving processes with different dynamical time scales, in order to avoid brute-force, unpractical quantum chemistry calculations on the complete system.In the first place, our interest is devoted to the available APEs models presently implemented in computational software, highlighting the quantum chemistry methods that can be used to treat the QM subsystem. We review the coupling strategy between the QM subsystem and the APE, which requires to examine the way the QM/MM mutual interactions are accounted for and how the polarization of the classical environment is considered with respect to (wrt) the quantum variables. Because of the need of reliable molecular and macromolecular structures, a pivotal aspect to address here is the handling of the system dynamics (i.e., gradients wrt nuclear positions are required), especially for large molecular assemblies composed by an overwhelming number of atoms, exploring many conformations on a complex energy landscape.Alongside, we highlight our views on the necessary steps to take toward more accurate general-purposes and transferable explicit embeddings. The main objective to achieve here is to design a more physically grounded multiscale approach. To do so, one should apply advanced new generation classical models to account for refined induction effects that are able to (i) improve the quality of QM/MM interaction energies; (ii) enhance transferability by avoiding the compulsory partial (or total) reparameterization of the classical model. Moreover, the extension of recent developments originating from the field of advanced classical molecular dynamics (MD) to the realm of QM/APE methods is a key direction to improve both speed and efficiency for the phase space exploration of systems of growing size and complexity.Lastly, we point out specific research topics where an advanced QM/APE dynamics can certainly shed some light. For example, we discuss chemical reactions in "harsh" environments and the case of spectroscopic theoretical modeling where the inclusion of refined environment effects is often mandatory.

Identifiers

PMID33961401
PMCPMC8264944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.