Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961312›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2021

Pulseq-CEST: Towards multi-site multi-vendor compatibility and reproducibility of CEST experiments using an open-source sequence standard.

Kai Herz, Sebastian Mueller, Or Perlman, Maxim Zaitsev, Linda Knutsson, Phillip Zhe Sun, Jinyuan Zhou, Peter van Zijl, Kerstin Heinecke, Patrick Schuenke and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Kai HerzMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7286-1454
Sebastian MuellerMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2699-9214
Or PerlmanAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-569X
Maxim ZaitsevHigh Field MR Center, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Linda KnutssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4263-113X
Phillip Zhe SunYerkes Imaging Center, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4872-1192
Jinyuan ZhouRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Peter van ZijlRussell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Kerstin HeineckePhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4024-4811
Patrick SchuenkePhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3179-4830
Christian T FarrarAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6623-8220
Manuel SchmidtDepartment of Neuroradiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Arnd DörflerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Klaus SchefflerMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6316-8773
Moritz ZaissMagnetic Resonance Center, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9780-3616
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEMax Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics · DEHarvard University · USJohns Hopkins University · USPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt · DEEmory University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Yerkes National Primate Research Center Role of type-I IFN in regulating COVID-19 induced inflammation and pathogenesisP51OD011132 · OD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Joon Sup Lee · 2012 to 2026
$167.0M
TR&D 4: Algorithms for functional and anatomical brain analysisP41EB015909 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2012 to 2020
$13.1M
Training/Dissemination-Resource for Molecular Imaging Agents in Precision MedicineP41EB024495 · NIBIB · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MARTIN G POMPER · 2017 to 2026
$11.8M
TRD 4: Platforms for multi-modal and multi-scale imaging dataP41EB031771 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI Hanzhang Lu, Peter CM Van Zijl · 2021 to 2026
$9.9M
Development and Translation of D-glucose as a Diagnostic Agent for MRI of CancerR01EB019934 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2015 to 2019
$5.7M
Clinically Translatable MRI Reporter Genes and Imaging Methods with Ultra-High Specificity and SensitivityR01EB031008 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI CHRISTIAN T FARRAR · 2021 to 2026
$4.0M
Novel Approaches for CEST Labeling, Detection, Quantification and TranslationR01EB015032 · NIBIB · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI VAN ZIJL, PETER CM · 2011 to 2019
$3.9M
A CEST-MRI Reporter Gene for Image Guided Oncolytic VirotherapyR01CA203873 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FARRAR, CHRISTIAN T · 2016 to 2020
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203873NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB024495NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB031771NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB015032NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB019934NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB031008NIH HHS P41 EB015909NIH HHS P41 EB024495NIH HHS P51 OD011132NIH HHS R01 CA203873NIH HHS RO1 EB015032NIH HHS RO1EB019934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the field of CEST grows, various novel preparation periods using different parameters are being introduced. At the same time, large, multisite clinical studies require clearly defined protocols, especially across different vendors. Here, we propose a CEST definition standard using the open Pulseq format for a shareable, simple, and exact definition of CEST protocols.

methodsWe present the benefits of such a standard in three ways: (1) an open database on GitHub, where fully defined, human-readable CEST protocols can be shared; (2) an open-source Bloch-McConnell simulation to test and optimize CEST preparation periods in silico; and (3) a hybrid MR sequence that plays out the CEST preparation period and can be combined with any existing readout module.

resultsThe exact definition of the CEST preparation period, in combination with the flexible simulation, leads to a good match between simulations and measurements. The standard allowed finding consensus on three amide proton transfer-weighted protocols that could be compared in healthy subjects and a tumor patient. In addition, we could show coherent multisite results for a sophisticated CEST method, highlighting the benefits regarding protocol sharing and reproducibility.

conclusionWith Pulseq-CEST, we provide a straightforward approach to standardize, share, simulate, and measure different CEST preparation schemes, which are inherently completely defined.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProtonsAmidesComputer SimulationHumansReproducibility of ResultsAmidesProtonsCESTopen-sourcePulseqstandardization

Identifiers

PMID33961312
PMCPMC9149651
OpenAlexW3157144764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.