Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961220›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

Comparative Genomics, from the Annotated Genome to Valuable Biological Information: A Case Study.

Sabina Zoledowska, Agata Motyka-Pomagruk, Agnieszka Misztak, Ewa Lojkowska

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabina ZoledowskaDepartment of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk & Medical University of Gdansk, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 58 Abrahama, Poland.
Agata Motyka-PomagrukDepartment of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk & Medical University of Gdansk, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 58 Abrahama, Poland.
Agnieszka MisztakDepartment of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk & Medical University of Gdansk, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 58 Abrahama, Poland.
Ewa LojkowskaDepartment of Plant Protection and Biotechnology, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology University of Gdansk & Medical University of Gdansk, University of Gdansk, Gdansk, 58 Abrahama, Poland. ewa.lojkowska@biotech.ug.edu.pl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High availability of fast, cheap, and high-throughput next generation sequencing techniques resulted in acquisition of numerous de novo sequenced and assembled bacterial genomes. It rapidly became clear that digging out useful biological information from such a huge amount of data presents a considerable challenge. In this chapter we share our experience with utilization of several handy open source comparative genomic tools. All of them were applied in the studies focused on revealing inter- and intraspecies variation in pectinolytic plant pathogenic bacteria classified to Dickeya solani and Pectobacterium parmentieri. As the described software performed well on the species within the Pectobacteriaceae family, it presumably may be readily utilized on some closely related taxa from the Enterobacteriaceae family. First of all, implementation of various annotation software is discussed and compared. Then, tools computing whole genome comparisons including generation of circular juxtapositions of multiple sequences, revealing the order of synteny blocks or calculation of ANI or Tetra values are presented. Besides, web servers intended either for functional annotation of the genes of interest or for detection of genomic islands, plasmids, prophages, CRISPR/Cas are described. Last but not least, utilization of the software designed for pangenome studies and the further downstream analyses is explained. The presented work not only summarizes broad possibilities assured by the comparative genomic approach but also provides a user-friendly guide that might be easily followed by nonbioinformaticians interested in undertaking similar studies.

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNADatabases, GeneticDickeyaDNA, BacterialPectobacteriumResearch DesignSoftware DesignWorkflowDNA, BacterialAnnotationCRISPR/CasDickeya spp.Next generation sequencingPangenome studyPectobacterium spp.PhagesSynteny

Identifiers

PMID33961220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.