ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021
Comparative Genomics, from the Annotated Genome to Valuable Biological Information: A Case Study.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High availability of fast, cheap, and high-throughput next generation sequencing techniques resulted in acquisition of numerous de novo sequenced and assembled bacterial genomes. It rapidly became clear that digging out useful biological information from such a huge amount of data presents a considerable challenge. In this chapter we share our experience with utilization of several handy open source comparative genomic tools. All of them were applied in the studies focused on revealing inter- and intraspecies variation in pectinolytic plant pathogenic bacteria classified to Dickeya solani and Pectobacterium parmentieri. As the described software performed well on the species within the Pectobacteriaceae family, it presumably may be readily utilized on some closely related taxa from the Enterobacteriaceae family. First of all, implementation of various annotation software is discussed and compared. Then, tools computing whole genome comparisons including generation of circular juxtapositions of multiple sequences, revealing the order of synteny blocks or calculation of ANI or Tetra values are presented. Besides, web servers intended either for functional annotation of the genes of interest or for detection of genomic islands, plasmids, prophages, CRISPR/Cas are described. Last but not least, utilization of the software designed for pangenome studies and the further downstream analyses is explained. The presented work not only summarizes broad possibilities assured by the comparative genomic approach but also provides a user-friendly guide that might be easily followed by nonbioinformaticians interested in undertaking similar studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33961220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.