Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961170›Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2021

Sepsis: deriving biological meaning and clinical applications from high-dimensional data.

Alex R Schuurman, Tom D Y Reijnders, Robert F J Kullberg, Joe M Butler, Tom van der Poll, W Joost Wiersinga

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Dysregulation of Host-Pathogen Interactions in Sepsis: Host-Related Factors.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The Plasma Lipidomic Landscape in Patients with Sepsis due to Community-acquired Pneumonia.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Clinical practice of sepsis-induced immunosuppression: Current immunotherapy and future options.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Host Response Biomarkers for Sepsis in the Emergency Room.Critical care (London, England) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex R SchuurmanCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9322-1117
Tom D Y ReijndersCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Robert F J KullbergCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Joe M ButlerCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
Tom van der PollCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
W Joost WiersingaCenter for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands. w.j.wiersinga@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 847422Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 16447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of sepsis is multi-facetted and highly complex. As sepsis is a leading cause of global mortality that still lacks targeted therapies, increased understanding of its pathogenesis is vital for improving clinical care and outcomes. An increasing number of investigations seeks to unravel the complexity of sepsis through high-dimensional data analysis, enabled by advances in -omics technologies. Here, we summarize progress in the following major -omics fields: genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, lipidomics, and microbiomics. We describe what these fields can teach us about sepsis, and highlight current trends and future challenges. Finally, we focus on multi-omics integration, and discuss the challenges in deriving biological meaning and clinical applications from these types of data.

Indexed as

High-dimensional dataIntegrationMulti-omicsSepsis

Identifiers

PMID33961170
PMCPMC8105470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.