Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961142›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021

Drug Repurposing: Claiming the Full Benefit from Drug Development.

Eric Kort, Stefan Jovinge

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Rare Disease Drug Repurposing.JAMA network open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Logic-based mechanistic machine learning on high-content images reveals how drugs differentially regulate cardiac fibroblasts.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eric KortDeVos Cardiovascular Research Program, Van Andel Institute/Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Stefan JovingeDeVos Cardiovascular Research Program, Van Andel Institute/Spectrum Health, Grand Rapids, MI, USA. Stefan.jovinge@vai.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8446-0228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDrug development has evolved over the years from being one-at-a-time to be massive screens in an industrial manner. Bringing a new therapeutic agent from concept to bedside can take a decade and cost billions of dollars-with most concepts failing along the way. Of the few compounds that make it to clinical testing, less than one out of eight make it to approval. This traditional drug development pipeline is challenging for prevalent diseases and makes the development of new therapeutics for rare diseases financially intractable. RECENT

findingsRepurposing of drugs is an alternative to identify new applications for the thousands of compounds that have already been approved for clinical use. There is now a range of strategies for such efforts that leverage clinical data, pharmacologic data, and/or genomic or transcriptomic data. These strategies, together with examples, are detailed in this review. Drug repurposing bypasses the pre-clinical work and thereby opens up the opportunity to provide targeted treatment at a fraction of the cost that is accompanied with the development from ideation to full approval. Such an approach makes drug discovery for any disease process more efficient but holds particular promise for rare diseases for which there is little to no other viable drug development channel.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningGenomicsHumansPharmacogeneticsRare diseasesRepositioningRepurposing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.