Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961110›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Synergic effect of corneal hysteresis and central corneal thickness in the risk of early-stage primary open-angle glaucoma progression.

Maria A Jiménez-Santos, Federico Saénz-Francés, Rubén Sánchez-Jean, José María Martinez-de-la Casa, Julian García-Feijoo, Luis Jañez-Escalada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria A Jiménez-SantosOphthalmology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, C/ Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid, Spain. mariajimenezsantos@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-1270
Federico Saénz-FrancésOphthalmology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, C/ Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3196-1491
Rubén Sánchez-JeanOphthalmology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, C/ Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9473-857X
José María Martinez-de-la CasaOphthalmology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, C/ Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9441-0542
Julian García-FeijooOphthalmology Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, C/ Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7772-5718
Luis Jañez-EscaladaLaboratorio de Vision, Instituro de Tecnología del Conocimiento, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0442-1270
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate corneal hysteresis (CH), acquired with ocular response analyzer (ORA), as a risk factor for glaucoma progression in early-stage primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).

methodsIn a historical cohort study, patients diagnosed in 2011 with early-stage POAG according to the Hodapp, Parrish and Anderson classification modified for Octopus perimetry and followed up until glaucomatous progression development; otherwise, observations were censored in October 2018. Cox regression was used to obtain hazard ratios (HR) to evaluate baseline variables (CH, central corneal thickness, gender, age IOP and glaucoma family history) as risk factors for perimetric glaucoma progression. A likelihood ratio test for interaction was performed in order to assess the effect of the combination of CH and CCT on the risk of progression.

resultsOf the cohort of 1573 patients, 11.38% developed early-stage POAG progression during the follow-up. The mean follow-up time was 3.28 ± 1.92 years. Patients without progression had a higher CH (11.35 ± 1.43 vs 9.07 ± 1.69 mmHg; p < 0.001) and CCT (570.75 ± 17.71 vs 554.51 ± 23.20; p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, each 1 mmHg of lower CH was associated with an increase of 2.13 times in the HR of progression (95% CI: 1.92-2.32; p < 0.001). CH hazard ratio was modified by CCT, with higher values of CCT and CH resulting in a higher HR of early glaucoma progression (p < 0.001).

conclusionsCH can be considered as a risk factor of progression in early-stage POAG. The risk associated with CH changed depending on CCT values, acting synergistically slowing the risk of glaucoma progression with higher values.

Indexed as

Glaucoma, Open-AngleCohort StudiesCorneaHumansIntraocular PressureProspective StudiesTonometry, OcularCorneal hysteresisPerimetryPrimary open-angle glaucomaProgressionRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33961110
OpenAlexW3158576928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.