Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961101›Full record

ArticleRheumatology international2022

Patient perspectives on the British Columbia Biosimilars Initiative: a qualitative descriptive study.

Caitlin Chew, Magda Aguiar, Nick Bansback, Michael R Law, Mark Harrison

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A Framework for Evaluating the Implementation of Biosimilar Drugs.The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Uptake of biosimilar drugs in Canada: analysis of provincial policies and usage data.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Caitlin ChewFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Campus, 4625-2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-0137
Magda AguiarFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Campus, 4625-2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7966-6897
Nick BansbackSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-3462
Michael R LawSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5637-6053
Mark HarrisonFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver Campus, 4625-2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. Mark.harrison@ubc.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2115-2447
University of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In May 2019, the Government of British Columbia (BC) announced the implementation of the Biosimilars Initiative, mandating the switch of biologic (originator) drugs to biosimilars for certain patient populations in the hopes of optimizing public resources. Through this qualitative study, we aimed to identify patients' perspectives as they undergo this change. From October 2019 to July 2020, we conducted nine pre- and six post-switch to biosimilar interviews with BC, English speaking participants, who were 18 years or older, and were currently taking a biologic medication. Participants were interviewed pre- and post-switch to a biosimilar medication and interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim for qualitative analysis. Interviews were thematically analysed and major themes and sub-categories were elucidated. The themes derived from pre and post-switch interviews captured participants' anticipated or experienced barriers and enablers to the policy change. In general, the fears and apprehension of participants approaching the switch, including concerns surrounding the efficacy and safety of biosimilars, were addressed by their rheumatologist and social support circles. For the most part, participants were able to successfully manage their disease regardless of their baseline concerns about efficacy and safety. Experiences of changes in health delivery models were also observed secondary to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic amongst participants. This study is the first of its kind to characterize the patient perspective regarding the BC Biosimilars Initiative. The incorporation of the patient perspective, including adequate provider-patient communication and shared decision-making can help to inform future non-medical switching policy changes.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsCOVID-19British ColumbiaHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsBiosimilarsBiosimilar switchingNon-medical switchingSwitching

Identifiers

PMID33961101
PMCPMC8102664
OpenAlexW3158216971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.