Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33961018›Full record

SynthesisBlood advances2021

Impact of R-CHOP dose intensity on survival outcomes in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review.

Edward J Bataillard, Chan Yoon Cheah, Matthew J Maurer, Arushi Khurana, Toby A Eyre, Tarec Christoffer El-Galaly

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edward J BataillardDepartment of Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6543-4297
Chan Yoon CheahDepartment of Haematology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7988-1565
Matthew J MaurerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences and.ORCID 0000-0002-1867-0526
Arushi KhuranaDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.ORCID 0000-0001-5645-0949
Toby A EyreOxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Headington, Oxford, United Kingdom; and.ORCID 0000-0002-6631-9749
Tarec Christoffer El-GalalyDepartment of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4406-380X

Funding

The Role of Monocytes in non-Hodgkin LymphomaP50CA097274 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI LENTZ, STEVEN R · 2002 to 2021
$45.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dilemma of whether to treat elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a full or reduced dose intensity (DI) of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone+rituximab) is often faced by clinicians. We conducted a systematic review assessing the impact of R-CHOP DI on DLBCL survival outcomes, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies with ≥100 patients treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapies published from January 2002 through November 2020. Studies were included if they reported the impact of R-CHOP DI on survival outcomes. We screened records, extracted data, and reviewed all the studies for quality and statistical appraisal. Of 380 screened records, 13 studies including 5188 patients were reviewed. DI was often calculated as the ratio of the cumulative delivered dose of prespecified drug(s) to the cumulative planned dose multiplied by a time-correction factor. Lower DI (intended or relative) was associated with inferior survival in 7 of 9 studies reporting crude survival analyses. Multivariable analysis using DI as a covariate was performed in 10 studies. Six showed an association (P < .05) with adjustment for other covariates, and 4 did not. Most studies and those larger studies of higher quality showed poorer outcomes associated with reduced DI. In subgroups aged ≥80 years, survival was not consistently affected by reduced DI. DI-specific randomized trials are warranted, but these data support full-dose R-CHOP in elderly and fit patients aged <80 years with DLBCL, but not in those aged ≥80 years, where dose-reduced R-CHOP does not appear to compromise survival.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseAgedAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinHumansRituximabVincristineAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedCyclophosphamideDoxorubicinRituximabVincristine

Identifiers

PMID33961018
PMCPMC8114545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.