Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960966›Full record

SynthesisJournal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives

Examining the Business Case for Patient Experience: A Systematic Review.

Denise D Quigley, Kerry Reynolds, Stephanie Dellva, Rebecca Anhang Price

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reporting patient experiences within elective perioperative care: a scoping review.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  12. Patient-reported experience is associated with higher future revenue and lower costs of hospitals.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Outcomes of Age-Friendly Health Systems: Return to Clinic After 4Ms Care Delivery.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denise D QuigleyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Kerry ReynoldsRAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Stephanie DellvaRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia; and.
Rebecca Anhang PriceRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.

Funding

Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems V (CAHPS V)U18HS025920 · AHRQ · RAND CORPORATION · PI HAYS, RONALD DALE · 2017 to 2021
$5.6M
AHRQ HHS U18 HS016980AHRQ HHS U18 HS025920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

executive summaryHospitals, physician groups, and other healthcare providers are investing in improved patient care experiences. Prior reviews have concluded that better patient care experiences are associated with less healthcare utilization and better adherence to recommended prevention and treatment, clinical outcomes, and patient safety within hospitals. No comprehensive review has examined the business case for investing in patient experiences. This article reviews the literature on associations between patient experience-measured from the perspective of patients and families-and business outcomes, including patient allegiance and retention, complaints, lawsuits, provider job satisfaction, and profitability. We searched U.S. English-language peer-reviewed articles from January 1990 to July 2019. We followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines and undertook a full-text review of 564 articles, yielding the inclusion of 40 articles. Our review found that patients with positive care experiences are more likely to return to the same hospital and ambulatory settings for future healthcare needs, retain their health plan, and voice fewer complaints. Associations between patient experiences and profitability or provider job satisfaction were limited/mixed. This suggests that providers can pursue better patient care experiences for the intrinsic value to patients, while also recognizing it is good for intermediate business outcomes: specifically increased recommendations, better patient retention, and fewer complaints. Nursing and physician care, broadly defined, are the only specific aspects of patient experience consistently associated with retention, with evidence pointing to communication and trust as parts of care linked to the intent to return. These aspects of patient experience are also the largest contributors to the overall ratings of a provider or facility.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHospitalsCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHumansJob Satisfaction

Identifiers

PMID33960966
PMCPMC11087015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.