Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960845›Full record

SynthesisJournal of adolescent and young adult oncology2022

Technology-Assisted Psychosocial Interventions for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anao Zhang, Bradley Zebrack, Chiara Acquati, Michael Roth, Nina Jackson Levin, Kaipeng Wang, Samantha Schwartz

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of adolescent and young adult oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Gaps in care, support, and research among diverse patients with early onset cancers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anao ZhangUniversity of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3199-1113
Bradley ZebrackUniversity of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Chiara AcquatiUniversity of Houston Graduate College of Social Work; and The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Health Disparities Research, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael RothDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nina Jackson LevinUniversity of Michigan School of Social Work, and Department of Anthropology, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kaipeng WangGraduate School of Social Work, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Samantha SchwartzUniversity of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training Center in Cancer Care DeliveryT32CA236621 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lauren P Wallner · 2020 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAdolescentChildHumansPsychosocial InterventionQuality of LifeTechnologyYoung Adultchildhood and AYA cancermeta-analysissurvivorship outcomestechnology-assisted intervention

Identifiers

PMID33960845
PMCPMC8864427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.