Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960745›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2021

Characteristics of central nervous system progression in non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib or alectinib.

Hiroaki Sakamoto, Noriko Yanagitani, Ryo Manabe, Ryosuke Tsugitomi, Shinsuke Ogusu, Takehiro Tozuka, Hiroshi Yoshida, Yoshiaki Amino, Ryo Ariyasu, Ken Uchibori and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Efficacy and safety of alectinib inTranslational lung cancer research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hiroaki SakamotoDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2284-746X
Noriko YanagitaniDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo ManabeDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke TsugitomiDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinsuke OgusuDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehiro TozukaDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroshi YoshidaDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki AminoDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryo AriyasuDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken UchiboriDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Satoru KitazonoDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7371-2787
Sadatomo TasakaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Makoto NishioDepartment of Thoracic Medical Oncology, The Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4969-4165
The Cancer Institute Hospital · JPHirosaki University · JP

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop resistance, leading to metastasis, with progression to the central nervous system (CNS) being a primary concern. Although alectinib has better CNS penetration than crizotinib, patients treated with alectinib also develop CNS progression. CNS metastases more likely occurs during crizotinib treatment due to less blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration capability than alectinib. CNS progression pattern may be different during crizotinib and alecitinib treatment. Understanding the characteristics of CNS progression is important for developing treatment strategies.

aimsWe compared the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS metastases among patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatment for ALK-positive NSCLCs. METHODS AND

resultsWe retrospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical characteristics of CNS progression in ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib or alectinib at our hospital between July 2011 and May 2020. CNS and systemic tumor progression were evaluated using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Fifty-three and 65 patients were treated with crizotinib and alectinib, respectively. Baseline CNS metastasis was observed in 18 and 27 patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups, respectively. Among the patients in the crizotinib and alectinib groups who developed disease progression, 15/49 (30.6%) and 9/44 (20.5%) had CNS progression, respectively (P = .344). Intra-CNS progression-free survival was significantly longer in the alectinib group than in the crizotinib group (median: 14.0 vs 5.6 months, P = .042). The number of CNS metastases sized ≥3 cm, rate of peritumoral brain edema, and the second progression pattern after treatment continuation was not significantly different between the groups.

conclusionWe observed no significant difference in the clinical-radiographic characteristics of CNS progression between patients undergoing crizotinib and alectinib treatments. Local therapy, including stereotactic radiosurgery, for CNS progression may be suitable and important following alectinib and crizotinib treatment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarbazolesCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsCrizotinibFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalalectinibALK protein, humanAnaplastic Lymphoma KinaseCarbazolesCrizotinibPiperidinesalectinibCNS metastasescrizotinibnon-small cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID33960745
PMCPMC8714545
OpenAlexW3158614630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.