Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960716›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Patient-provider discussion about emotional and social needs, mental health outcomes, and benefit finding among U.S. Adults living with cancer.

Young-Rock Hong, Sandhya Yadav, Ryan Suk, Ahmad Khanijahani, Daniel Erim, Kea Turner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07673731 (Addressing Cancer-Related Distress Through Survivorship Care in Community Oncology), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07673731 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Cancer-Related Distress Through Survivorship Care in Community Oncology

TypeinterventionalSponsorEllis MedicineRan2026 to 2027Enrolled15ConditionsPsychosocial Distress, CancerArmsStructured Survivorship Visit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Young-Rock HongDepartment of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-5687
Sandhya YadavDepartment of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6840-3784
Ryan SukCenter for Health Services Research, Department of Management, Policy and Community Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
Ahmad KhanijahaniRangos School of Health Sciences, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-9421
Daniel ErimParexel International, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6604-7640
Kea TurnerDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA discussion about patient's nonmedical needs during treatment is considered a crucial component of high-quality patient-provider communication. We examined whether having a patient-provider discussion about cancer patients' emotional and social needs is associated with their psychological well-being.

methodsUsing the 2016-2017 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey-Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement (MEPS-ECSS) data, we identified the cancer survivors in the United States (US) who reported having a detailed discussion about emotional and social needs during cancer care. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the association between having a patient-provider discussion and the patients' psychological well-being outcomes (depressive symptoms, severe psychological distress, and worrying about cancer recurrence/worsening condition) and benefit finding experience after a cancer diagnosis.

resultsAmong 1433 respondents (equivalent to 13.8 million cancer survivors in the US), only 33.6% reported having a detailed patient-provider discussion about their emotional and social needs. Having a discussion was associated with 55% lower odds (odds ratio [OR], 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.77) of having depressive symptoms and 97% higher odds (OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.46-2.66) of having benefit finding experience. There was no statistically significant association between patient-provider discussion and psychological distress or worrying about cancer recurrence/worsening.

conclusionDetailed patient-provider discussion about the cancer patients' emotional and social needs was associated with a lower likelihood of depressive symptoms and a higher likelihood of experiencing benefit finding. These findings stress the importance of improving the patient-provider discussion about psychosocial needs in cancer survivorship.

Indexed as

CommunicationNeeds AssessmentPhysician-Patient RelationsSocial SupportSurvivorshipAdultAgedAnxietyCancer SurvivorsDepressionDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental Health

Identifiers

PMID33960716
PMCPMC8178502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.