Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960687›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021

Benefits of Early Ambulation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression and Fusion Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Jie Huang, Zhan Shi, Fang-Fang Duan, Ming-Xing Fan, Shuo Yan, Yi Wei, Bing Han, Xue-Mei Lu, Wei Tian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05359926 (Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05359926 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Early Versus Delayed Urinary Catheter Removal After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Kansas Medical CenterRan2022 to 2023Enrolled0ConditionsFoley Catheterization, AmbulationArmsExperimental, Active comparator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie HuangDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhan ShiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Fang-Fang DuanDepartment of Epidemiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ming-Xing FanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuo YanDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yi WeiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bing HanDepartment of Nursing, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xue-Mei LuDepartment of Nursing, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei TianDepartment of Spine Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2749-3776
Peking University · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Health Commission BMHC2018-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the effects of early ambulation on elderly patients' postoperative physical functional outcomes, complications, 90-day readmission rate, and the length of postoperative hospital stay.

methodsThis is a prospective cohort study conducted between June 2019 and December 2019. The study enrolled 86 elderly patients (39 males) with newly diagnosed lumbar degenerative disease undergoing single-segment decompression and fusion surgerywere enrolled. Of all 86 patients, 39 voluntarily joined the early ambulation group, and 47 joined the regular ambulation group. The early ambulation group included patients ambulated within 4 h postoperatively, whereas the regular ambulation group included patients who were ambulatory at a minimum of 24 h after surgery. Participants' baseline characteristics, surgical information, ambulation ability, degree of pain, functional scores, postoperative complications, 90-day readmission rate, and length of postoperative hospital stay were recorded.

resultsParticipants' baseline demographic characteristics were balanced between the early ambulation group and the regular ambulation group. The operative time and blood loss were similar between groups. The time before the first-time ambulation was 4 ± 0.5 h in the early ambulation group and 28 ± 4.5 h in the regular ambulation group. Ambulating distance was significantly longer in the early ambulation group compared with the regular ambulation group on the 1st (63 ± 45 vs 23 ± 60 m), the 2nd (224 ± 100 vs 101 ± 130 m), and the 3rd (280 ± 102.5 vs 190 ± 170 m) ambulation days based on generalized estimating equation analyses. Generalized estimating equation analyses also demonstrated that the ambulating time was longer in the early ambulation group compared with the regular ambulation group on the 1st (10 ± 5 vs 10 ± 5 min), the 2nd (19 ± 7 vs 15 ± 5 min), and the 3rd (22 ± 16.5 vs 27 ± 12 min) ambulation days. Patients in the regular ambulation group experienced a higher degree of pain than the early ambulation group patients, with an odds ratio of 1.627 (P = 0.002). Short-term functional independence was superior in the early ambulation group, with a lower Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score (P = 0.008) and Oswestry disability index (P < 0.001). The incidences of postoperative urinary retention (early ambulation group: 7.7%, regular ambulation group: 25.5%, P = 0.030) and ileus (early ambulation group: 0%, regular ambulation group: 12.8%, P = 0.030) were significantly higher in the regular ambulation group. The prevalence of at least one complication rate was significantly lower in the early ambulation group than in the regular ambulation group (early ambulation group, 23.1%; regular ambulation group, 46.8%, P = 0.022). The duration of indwelling of the drainage catheter was shorter in the early ambulation group (early ambulation group, 68 ± 24 h; regular ambulation group, 78 ± 20 h, P = 0.001), and the length of the postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the early ambulation group (early ambulation group, 4 ± 0 days; regular ambulation group: 5 ± 2 days, P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in the 90-day readmission rate between groups.

conclusionEarly ambulation improved patients' postoperative functional status, decreased the incidence of complications, and shortened postoperative hospital stay in elderly patients undergoing lumbar decompression and fusion surgery.

Indexed as

AgedCohort StudiesDecompression, SurgicalDisability EvaluationEarly AmbulationFemaleHumansLength of StayLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSpinal FusionEarly ambulationElderly patientNurseSpinal surgery

Identifiers

PMID33960687
PMCPMC8274205
OpenAlexW3159652872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.