Trial reportInternational wound journal2022
A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears.
Trial report in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A pragmatic randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the use of silicone dressings for the treatment of skin tears.International wound journal · 2022Trial
- Development and Validation of the Content of a Mobile Digital Board-Game Application, Constituting a Playful Tool for the Management of Friction Injuries.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One of the most common types of skin breakdown in ageing populations is skin tears. The International Skin Tear Advisory Panel advocates for special attention to be paid to dressing selection related to skin tear management. The panel recommends choosing dressings that will promote the maintenance of moisture balance, suit the local wound environment, protect peri-wound skin, control or manage exudate and infection, and optimise caregiver time. It is paramount that dressings protect the fragile nature of the skin associated with those who at heightened risk for skin tear development. To compare the effectiveness of soft silicone dressings (a contact layer and/or foam) for the healing of skin tears with local practices that do not include soft silicone dressings. The study was a pragmatic randomised controlled prospective study. One hundred and twenty-six individuals from two long-term care facilities in Ontario Canada who presented with skin tears were randomised into the treatment group using either soft silicone dressings (a contact layer and/or foam) or the control group using non-adhesive dressings. The current study demonstrated that 96.9% (n = 63) of skin tears in the treatment group healed over a 3-week period compared with 34.4% (n = 21) in the control group. The proportion of wound healing experienced at week 2 was 89.2% (n = 58) in the treatment group compared with 27.9% (n = 17) in the control group. There was a significantly greater reduction in wound surface area relative to baseline in the treatment group (2.9 cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.