Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960659›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2021

COVID-19: vaccine's progress.

Harald Brüssow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Weaponising microbes for peace.Microbial biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A case report of new onset graves' disease induced by SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccine?Journal of clinical and translational endocrinology case reports · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The darkest microbiome-a post-human biosphere.Microbial biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  12. CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  13. Subacute Thyroiditis After Receiving Inactivated Virus Vaccine for COVID-19.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Article
  14. COVID-19: vaccine's progress.Microbial biotechnology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harald BrüssowDepartment of Biosystems, Laboratory of Gene Technology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4783-8583
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under the pressure of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines were developed and rolled out into mass vaccination campaigns at incredible speed. What normally takes a decade was worked out within a year. Vaccines were produced along many different platforms ranging from inactivated whole virus vaccines over adenovirus-vectored vaccines, recombinant protein vaccines and nanoparticles to mRNA vaccines. Several vaccines went through preclinical testing and completed successful phase 1 to phase 3 clinical trials. The first evaluations of national vaccination campaigns document astonishing high levels of protection against disease. The present article summarizes the published reports leading to these striking achievements with vaccines based on different concepts.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesGenetic VectorsHumansPandemicsVaccines, SyntheticCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID33960659
PMCPMC8209887
OpenAlexW3158492329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.