ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2021
DebarcodeR increases fluorescent cell barcoding capacity and accuracy.
Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discovery of natural products that modulate signaling in patient-derived cells.RSC chemical biology · 2026Article
- Spirocyclic β-lactone secondary metabolites modulate spliceosome function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Multiplexed activity metabolomics for isolation of filipin macrolides from a hypogean actinomycete.The Journal of antibiotics · 2025Article
- Multiplexed cytometry for single cell chemical biology.Methods in cell biology · 2025Article
- Cell Viability Multiplexing: Quantification of Cellular Viability by Barcode Flow Cytometry and Computational Analysis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Hybrid Fluorescent Mass-Tag Nanotrackers as Universal Reagents for Long-Term Live-Cell Barcoding.Analytical chemistry · 2022Article
- Systems Immunology Analyses ofImmunoHorizons · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fluorescent cell barcoding (FCB) enables efficient collection of tens to hundreds of flow cytometry samples by covalently marking cells with varying concentration of spectrally distinct dyes. A key consideration in FCB is to balance the density of dye barcodes, the complexity of cells in the sample, and the desired accuracy of the debarcoding. Unfortunately, barcoding bench and computational methods have not benefited from the high dimensional revolution in cytometry due to a lack of automated computational tools that effectively balance these common cytometry needs. DebarcodeR addresses these unmet needs by providing a framework for computational debarcoding augmented by improvements to experimental methods. Adaptive regression modeling accounted for differential dye uptake between different cell types and Gaussian mixture modeling provided a robust method to probabilistically assign cells to samples. Assignment tolerance parameters are available to allow users to balance high cell recovery with accurate assignments. Improvements to experimental methods include: (1) inclusion of an "external standard" control where a pool of all cells was stained a single level of each barcoding dyes and (2) an "internal standard" where each cell is stained with a single level of a separate dye. DebarcodeR significantly improved speed, accuracy, and reproducibility of FCB while avoiding selective loss of unusual cell subsets when debarcoding microtiter plates of cell lines and heterogenous mixtures of primary cells. DebarcodeR is available on Github as an R package that works with flowCore and Cytoverse packages at github.com/cytolab/DebarcodeR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.