Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33960406›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2021

Effectiveness of maintenance electroconvulsive therapy-Evidence from modifications due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Isabel Methfessel, Matthias Besse, Michael Belz, David Zilles-Wegner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Isabel MethfesselDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Matthias BesseDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael BelzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
David Zilles-WegnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7531-9732
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveContinuation and maintenance ECT (c-/m-ECT) are effective in the prevention of relapse and recurrence of both affective and psychotic disorders. However, data are scarce concerning the trajectories of severe mental disorders after the end of c-/m-ECT. This prospective study investigates the clinical outcome of patients with versus without modifications of their c-/m-ECT schedules.

methodsIn the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, ECT capacities were restricted at many clinics in early 2020. All patients receiving c-/m-ECT in March and April 2020 at our department (n = 53, unipolar depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia) were followed up for six months to investigate the impact of treatment modifications imposed by the pandemic. Based on individual decisions, c-/m-ECT was either (a) continued without modification, (b) continued with reduced frequency, or (c) discontinued.

resultsBoth reduced frequency and discontinuation of c-/m-ECT were associated with significant clinical deterioration as measured by CGI-I (Clinical Global Impression Scale - Global Improvement) during the six-month follow-up when compared to the subgroup of patients without any treatment modification (p = 0.005, p = 0.011). Furthermore, patients with discontinued or reduced c-/m-ECT showed significantly higher rates of rehospitalizations (p = 0.028) and new acute courses of ECT (p = 0.018).

conclusionDespite the limitations of a heterogeneous and relatively small sample, our study strongly corroborates the effectiveness of c-/m-ECT in a real-world population. Especially, patients with shorter time since index ECT seem to be at high risk for severe clinical deterioration in the case of treatment discontinuation or reduction.

Indexed as

COVID-19Electroconvulsive TherapyHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Treatment Outcomecontinuation ECTCOVID-19effectivenesselectroconvulsive therapymaintenance ECT

Identifiers

PMID33960406
PMCPMC8212113
OpenAlexW3159663881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.