Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959957›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychobiology2021

Memory binding and theta EEG during middle childhood.

Vinaya Rajan, Kimberly Cuevas, Martha Ann Bell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychobiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vinaya RajanDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0842-3572
Kimberly CuevasDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Waterbury, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1811-1131
Martha Ann BellDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.

Funding

Psychobiology of Cognitive DevelopmentR01HD049878 · NICHD · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BELL, MARTHA ANN · 2007 to 2017
$5.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to bind together the contextual details associated with an event undergoes dramatic improvement during childhood. However, few studies have examined the neural correlates of memory binding encoding and retrieval during middle childhood. We examined age-related encoding and retrieval differences using continuous electroencephalogram (EEG) measures in a sample of 6- and 8-year-olds. For the memory binding task, children were tested on memory for individual items (i.e., objects and backgrounds only) and combined object-backgrounds pairings (combination condition). Memory for individual item information was comparable across both age groups. However, younger children experienced greater difficulty (i.e., higher false alarm rate) in the combination condition. Theta (4-7 Hz) neuronal oscillations were analyzed to compare memory encoding and retrieval processes. Widespread retrieval-related increases in theta band EEG power (compared with baseline and encoding-related activation) were evident in both 6- and 8-year-olds. Regression analyses revealed that parietal theta EEG power during retrieval accounted for variability in memory binding performance. These findings suggest that theta rhythms are intricately linked to memory binding processes during middle childhood.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographyMental RecallChildCognitionHumansMemoryTheta RhythmEEG powerencodingmemory bindingmiddle childhoodretrieval

Identifiers

PMID33959957
PMCPMC9020213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.