Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959875›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2021

Learning about construction behaviour from observing an artefact: can experience with conspecifics aid in artefact recognition?

Andrés Camacho-Alpízar, Tristan Eckersley, Connor T Lambert, Gopika Balasubramanian, Lauren M Guillette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bird nest building: visions for the future.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Andrés Camacho-AlpízarDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8896-3319
Tristan EckersleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2193-9047
Connor T LambertDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3568-1868
Gopika BalasubramanianDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-9331
Lauren M GuilletteDepartment of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada. guillett@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8777-6543
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

Faculty of Sceince, University of Alberta Start-up GrantNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada DGECR-2019-00173Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC RGPIN-2019-04733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observation of or interaction with the enduring products of behaviour, called 'social artefacts' (e.g. an abandoned nest) is a potential source of social information. To learn from an artefact, that artefact needs to be recognized as the product of a behaviour that can provide relevant information (i.e. the artefact should be recognized as a nest). We used zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to experimentally test whether observing a conspecific using a nest facilitates recognition of a future artefact as a source of social information. We manipulated the opportunity to form an association between a conspecific and their nest: half the subjects observed a pair of birds incubating eggs in a nest, the control subjects did not get this opportunity. Then, subjects observed an artefact made of their non-preferred colour and finally were allowed to build a nest. We predicted that the subjects given the opportunity to associate a nest with conspecifics would copy the colour of the artefact (i.e. use social information). We found that subjects who had the opportunity to learn what a nest is used social information obtained from the artefact by increasing their use of the artefact-material colour after artefact observation, while control birds did not. These data suggest that forming an association between conspecifics and their nest facilitates recognition of an artefact as a nest affecting how first-time builders use social information. This finding is important because it demonstrates that social learning is not limited to observing behaviour, but rather inferring behaviour from an artefact.

Indexed as

FinchesSocial LearningAnimalsArtifactsNesting BehaviorRecognition, PsychologyAnimal constructionArtefactDecision makingMaterial preferenceNest constructionSocial learningZebra finch

Identifiers

PMID33959875
OpenAlexW3159634378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.