ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2021
Outcomes of a multi-ethnic Asian population on combined treatment with clopidogrel and omeprazole in 12,440 patients.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effects of treatment with clopidogrel with or without proton pump inhibitor omeprazole on the risk of ischemic stroke: a nationwide cohort study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Epidemiology of potential drug- drug interactions in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in China: a retrospective study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- From genes to drugs:Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Improving the feasibility of deprescribing proton pump inhibitors: GPs' insights on barriers, facilitators, and strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Impact of Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Clopidogrel on Recurrent Stroke and Myocardial Infarction.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Effects of Different Doses of Clopidogrel plus Early Rehabilitation Therapy on Motor Function and Inflammatory Factors in Patients with Ischemic Stroke.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Omeprazole is commonly co-prescribed with clopidogrel. Clopidogrel requires bio-activation by cytochrome P450 CYP2C19. Omeprazole may reduce clopidogrel's antithrombotic efficacy by inhibiting CYP2C19. Studies in Caucasians receiving omeprazole with clopidogrel showed no significant increase in death and myocardial infarction with this drug-drug interaction. There are limited large-scale studies in Asians, who may have a greater prevalence of CYP2C19 loss-of-function polymorphisms. A single centre retrospective cohort study was undertaken based on a review of medication records and prescription data. Patients prescribed clopidogrel from 2009 to 2012 were followed-up with until December 2012 (median:29 months). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality and secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accidents, and subsequent coronary interventions. Of 12,440 patients prescribed clopidogrel, 62%(n = 7714) were on omeprazole (63.8% Chinese, 13.9% Malay, 12.4% Indian, 10.0% others), and 38%(n = 4726) were not on omeprazole or other proton pump inhibitors (62.6% Chinese, 13.5% Malay, 10.7% Indian, 13.2% others). Mortality after co-prescription occurred in 14.3%(n = 1101) of patients, compared to 6.3%(n = 300) of patients prescribed clopidogrel only. Multivariate analysis using propensity score adjusted analysis showed no significant increase in all-cause mortality with co-prescription (adjusted hazards ratio [AHR] 1.13, [95%CI 0.95-1.35]). Patients on co-prescription had a higher risk of subsequent MI (16% vs 3.8%; AHR 2.03 [95%CI 1.70-2.44]), but not of cerebrovascular accidents (5.0% vs 2.0%; AHR 0.98 [95%CI 0.76-1.27]) or coronary interventions (1.7% vs 0.7%; AHR 1.28 [95%CI 0.83-1.96]). The risk of a subsequent MI was higher in the Malay (AHR 2.43 [95%CI 1.68-3.52]) and Chinese (AHR 2.06 [95%CI 1.63-2.60]) population as compared to the Indian (AHR 1.56 [95%CI 1.06-2.31]) population. In conclusion, the use of clopidogrel with omeprazole is associated with an increased risk of MI, but not mortality or stroke, in this multi-ethnic Asian population. These risks appear to vary among different ethnic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.