Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959831›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2021

Differences in Sociodemographic Disparities Between Patients Undergoing Surgery for Advanced Colorectal or Ovarian Cancer.

Ellen M Goldberg, Yaniv Berger, Divya Sood, Katherine C Kurnit, Josephine S Kim, Nita K Lee, S Diane Yamada, Kiran K Turaga, Oliver S Eng

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed, Advanced Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline Update.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ellen M GoldbergUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yaniv BergerDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Divya SoodDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Katherine C KurnitDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Josephine S KimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Nita K LeeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
S Diane YamadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kiran K TuragaDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Oliver S EngDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. oeng@surgery.bsd.uchicago.edu.

Funding

Scholars in Oncology Associated Research (SOAR)R25CA240134 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 2019 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA240134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytoreductive surgery (CRS) for ovarian cancer with peritoneal metastases (OPM) is an established treatment, yet access-related racial and socioeconomic disparities are well documented. CRS for colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (CRPM) is garnering more widespread acceptance, and it is unknown what disparities exist with regards to access.

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional multicenter study analyzed medical records from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2015. Patients diagnosed with CRPM or ORP only and either no or confirmed resection were included. Patient- and facility-level characteristics were analyzed using uni- and multivariable logistic regressions to identify associations with receipt of CRS.

resultsA total of 6634 patients diagnosed with CRPM and 14,474 diagnosed with OPM were included in this study. Among patients with CRPM, 18.1% underwent CRS. On multivariable analysis, female gender (odds ratio [95% CI] 2.04 [1.77-2.35]; P < 0.001) and treatment at an academic or research facility (OR 1.55 [1.17-2.05]; P = 0.002) were associated with CRS. Among patients with OPM, 87.1% underwent CRS. On multivariable analysis, treatment at facilities with higher-income patient populations was positively associated with CRS, while age (OR 0.97 [0.96-0.98]; P < .0001), use of nonprivate insurance (OR 0.69 [0.56-0.85]; P = 0.001), and listed as Black (OR 0.62 [0.45-0.86]; P = 0.004) were negatively associated with CRS.

conclusionThere were more systemic barriers to CRS for patients with OPM than for patients with CRPM. As CRS becomes more widely practiced for CRPM, it is likely that more socioeconomic and demographic barriers will be elucidated.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsHyperthermia, InducedOvarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresFemaleHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33959831
PMCPMC8530985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.