ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021
The Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in ARVC.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Insights Into Genetics and Pathophysiology of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.Current heart failure reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAim of the paper was to address all strengths and weakness of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, trying to highlight areas where further research and investigations should be carried out to fill current gaps in scientific knowledge. RECENT
findingsArrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy represents a multifaceted clinical entity associated with arrhythmias and sudden death. Even though different diagnostic tools are available for appropriate identification and risk stratification, over the last few years cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) has surfaced as an unmatched non-invasive imaging tool. CMR is mandatory in the evaluation of arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. It is the only imaging technique providing the identification of myocardial fibrosis, particularly for left ventricular myocardium, as recent evidences demonstrated that left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is associated with greater risk of sudden death than lone right ventricular involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.