Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959817›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pediatrics2021

Ethical and practical dilemmas in cardiac transplantation in infants: a literature review.

Marieke Donné, Michel De Pauw, Kristof Vandekerckhove, Thierry Bové, Joseph Panzer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Successful Weaning off LVAD Support in an Infant by Pulmonary Artery Banding.The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon reports · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Pig heart and lung xenotransplantation: Present status.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marieke DonnéDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9938-4478
Michel De PauwDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7697-3931
Kristof VandekerckhoveDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1481-0878
Thierry BovéDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3786-0699
Joseph PanzerDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. joseph.panzer@uzgent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8667-8001
Ghent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The waiting time in infants for a cardiac transplant remains high, due to the scarcity of donors. Consequently, waiting list morbidity and mortality are higher than those in other age groups. Therefore, the decision to list a small infant for cardiac transplantation is seen as an ethical dilemma by most physicians. This review aims to describe outcomes, limitations, and ethical considerations in infant heart transplantation. We used Medline and Embase as data sources. We searched for publications on infant (< 1 year) heart transplantation, bridge-to-transplant and long-term outcomes, and waiting list characteristics from January 2009 to March 2021. Outcome after cardiac transplant in infants is better than that in older children (1-year survival 88%), and complications are less frequent (25% CAV, 10% PTLD). The bridge-to-transplant period in infants is associated with increased mortality (32%) and decreased transplantation rate (43%). This is mainly due to MCS complications or the limited MCS options (with 51% mortality in infancy). Outcomes are worse for infants with CHD or in need of ECMO-support.Conclusion: Infants listed for cardiac transplantation have a high morbidity and mortality, especially in the period between diagnosis and transplantation. For those who receive cardiac transplant, the outlook is encouraging. Unfortunately, despite growing experience in VAD, mortality in children < 10 kg and children with CHD remains high. After transplantation, patients carry a psychological burden and there is a probability of re-transplantation later in life, with decreased outcomes compared to primary transplantation. These considerations are seen as an important ethical dilemma in many centers, when considering cardiac transplantation in infants (< 1 year). What is Known: • For infants, waitlist mortality remains high. In the pediatric population, MCS reduces the waiting list mortality. What is New: • Outcomes after infant cardiac transplantation are better than other age groups; however, MCS options remain limited, with persistently high waiting list mortality. • Future developments in MCS and alternative options to reduce waiting list mortality such as ABO-incompatible transplantation and pulmonary artery banding are encouraging and will improve ethical decision-making when an infant is in need of a cardiac transplant.

Indexed as

Heart TransplantationChildForecastingHumansInfantRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsWaiting ListsCardiac transplantHeart transplantInfantsWaiting list

Identifiers

PMID33959817
OpenAlexW3157993463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.