Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33959707›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2021

Two cortical representations of voice control are differentially involved in speech fluency.

Nicole E Neef, Annika Primaßin, Alexander Wolff von Gudenberg, Peter Dechent, Heiner Christian Riedel, Walter Paulus, Martin Sommer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole E NeefDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg August University, Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-7595
Annika PrimaßinDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg August University, Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Alexander Wolff von GudenbergInstitut der Kasseler Stottertherapie, Bad Emstal, Germany.
Peter DechentDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, MR Research in Neurosciences, Georg August University, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Heiner Christian RiedelDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Georg August University, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Walter PaulusDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg August University, Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
Martin SommerDepartment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Georg August University, Göttingen, Göttingen 37075, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DEUniversity of Kassel · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have identified two distinct cortical representations of voice control in humans, the ventral and the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex. Strikingly, while persistent developmental stuttering has been linked to a white-matter deficit in the ventral laryngeal motor cortex, intensive fluency-shaping intervention modulated the functional connectivity of the dorsal laryngeal motor cortical network. Currently, it is unknown whether the underlying structural network organization of these two laryngeal representations is distinct or differently shaped by stuttering intervention. Using probabilistic diffusion tractography in 22 individuals who stutter and participated in a fluency shaping intervention, in 18 individuals who stutter and did not participate in the intervention and in 28 control participants, we here compare structural networks of the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex and the ventral laryngeal motor cortex and test intervention-related white-matter changes. We show (i) that all participants have weaker ventral laryngeal motor cortex connections compared to the dorsal laryngeal motor cortex network, regardless of speech fluency, (ii) connections of the ventral laryngeal motor cortex were stronger in fluent speakers, (iii) the connectivity profile of the ventral laryngeal motor cortex predicted stuttering severity (iv) but the ventral laryngeal motor cortex network is resistant to a fluency shaping intervention. Our findings substantiate a weaker structural organization of the ventral laryngeal motor cortical network in developmental stuttering and imply that assisted recovery supports neural compensation rather than normalization. Moreover, the resulting dissociation provides evidence for functionally segregated roles of the ventral laryngeal motor cortical and dorsal laryngeal motor cortical networks.

Indexed as

diffusion imagingspeechstutteringvoice controlwhite-matter pathways

Identifiers

PMID33959707
PMCPMC8088816
OpenAlexW3119615559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.