ArticleHuman reproduction open2021
Potential risk factors for caesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Human chorionic gonadotropin levels of cesarean scar pregnancy compared with those of other ectopic pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Reduced peripheral natural killer cell counts may be a predictive marker for cesarean scar pregnancy.BMC immunology · 2026Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of cesarean scar pregnancy: prediction of intraoperative blood loss and the role of preoperative uterine artery embolization.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Management of Viable Cesarean Scar Pregnancies (CSP) with Potassium Chloride (KCl) and the Requirement for Adjunctive Treatments.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- Are the Risk Factors for Developing Type 1 and Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Different?Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Article
- ITGB3 and associated molecules as critical biomarkers in Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Surgical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy based on the three-category system: a retrospective analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Isthmocele and Infertility.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Case report: Successful laparoscopic management of early abdominal pregnancy.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Methotrexate treatment of very high β-HCG ectopic pregnancy on previous cesarean scar: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2023Article
- Safe Service Delivery of a Complex Early Pregnancy Problem: Caesarean Scar Pregnancy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Conservative Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Case Report and Literature Review.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the important risk factors for having a caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Independent risk factors were smoking in the first trimester, higher parity, and previous caesarean section (CS) before the index caesarean delivery. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: A spectrum of risk factors for CSP has been suggested but not proven: parity, number of previous caesarean section, elective as opposed to emergency CS, IVF-pregnancy, breech presentation, previous gynaecological surgery as well as suture technique. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: This retrospective case-control study included 31 women with a CSP during the period 2003-2018 treated at a tertiary care centre for gynaecology and reproduction. A control cohort of 8300 women with a history of a CS and a subsequent delivery during the same time period was formed. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsVariables describing demography, lifestyle factors, and reproductive and obstetric history were retrieved from medical records and the obstetric hospital database. Logistic regression analyses were applied to identify potential risk factors. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In a multivariable analysis, smoking in first trimester (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.03, 95% CI 1.01-9.07), higher parity (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03-1.64) and previous CS in addition to the preceding CS (adjusted OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.35-8.66) were independently predictive of a CSP. An elective CS at the index pregnancy was associated with an increased risk of CSP but did not remain significant in the multivariable analysis. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: CSP is a very rare phenomenon and several of the risk factor estimates are imprecise. Nevertheless, significant risk factors could be identified. Another limitation is the lack of electronically recorded details on suture techniques. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThe identified factors, namely higher parity and previous CS before the index caesarean section, are in accordance with previously suggested risk factors. Whether there is a true risk association between elective CS and future CSP needs to be investigated further. Smoking in the first trimester is a new finding, which has a plausible rationale. These factors should be recognised when counselling women after a caesarean delivery, particularly in a subsequent pregnancy with early complications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This work was supported by a grant from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-720291). None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.